Citation : 2018 Latest Caselaw 2090 ALL
Judgement Date : 23 August, 2018
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 42893 of 2012 Petitioner :- Paritosh Vishvas And Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru Secy. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- J.P.S. Chauhan Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Faneesh Mishra Hon'ble Shashi Kant Gupta,J.
Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that his client is not responding in the matter.
It appears that by efflux of time the writ petition has become infructuous .
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 23.8.2018
MLK
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!