Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 4110 ALL
Judgement Date : 7 September, 2017
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 10 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 22331 of 2016 Petitioner :- Co-Operative Cane Development Society Ltd. And Anr. Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajay Kumar Sharma,Sr. Advocate Counsel for Respondent :- \.S.C.,Tarun Agrawal Hon'ble Arun Tandon,J.
Hon'ble Ritu Raj Awasthi,J.
One simple issue which needs to be answered by this Court is as to whether a subordinate legislation can be made so as to have retrospective effect.
While counsel for the petitioner Sri H.R. Mishra, with reference to the paragraph no. 14 of the judgment in the case of Director General of Foreign Trade Vs. Kanak Exports and another 2016 (2) SCC 226, could submit that the subordinate rule training authority cannot legislate/frame of rules/notification with retrospective effect.
Counsel for the State as well as counsel for the respondent Sugar Mill seek time to respond to the same. On their request, put up this case tomorrow i.e. on 8th September, 2017.
Order Date :- 7.9.2017
Ishan
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!