Tuesday, 28, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Rama Bhai vs State Of U.P. And Another
2017 Latest Caselaw 5538 ALL

Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 5538 ALL
Judgement Date : 23 October, 2017

Allahabad High Court
Rama Bhai vs State Of U.P. And Another on 23 October, 2017
Bench: Om Prakash-Vii



HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
 
 

?Court No. - 50
 

 
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 34569 of 2017
 

 
Applicant :- Rama Bhai
 
Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another
 
Counsel for Applicant :- Pratibha Singh,Ashok Kumar Singh
 
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
 

 
Hon'ble Om Prakash-VII,J.

The present application has been filed by the applicant under Section 482 Cr.P.C. with the prayer to quash the entire proceedings of complaint case no. 494 of 2017 (Surajpal Singh Vs. Rama Bhai and another), under Sections 420, 468, 406 IPC, Police Station Raja Ka Rampur District - Etah arising out of summoning order dated 19.11.2008 pending in the court of Civil Judge (S.D.)/F.T.C., Etah. Further prayer has been made to stay the further proceedings of the aforesaid case.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned AGA appearing for the State.

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the complaint was filed  on the basis of false facts and also on the basis of malice.  It is further submitted that from the version of the complaint as well as statement of witnesses, offence under the aforesaid Sections is not made out against the applicant. General allegations have been made in the complaint. The impugned order suffers from illegality and infirmity.

On the other hand, learned AGA has submitted that applicant has been summoned on the basis of the statements recorded under Sections 200 Cr.P.C. and 202 Cr.P.C.. The impugned order does not suffer from any illegality or infirmity.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, after perusing the entire record and having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, I am of the view that no case is made out to interfere with the impugned order. The impugned order does not suffer from any infirmity or illegality. The Magistrate dealing with complaint at this stage has to see only prima-facie case and it cannot be said that no prima-facie case is made out against the applicant. Further, the plea raised before this Court would require leading of evidence, which can be raised before the court concerned at the appropriate Stage. Hence, the prayer made in the present application is refused.

However, it is observed that in case the applicant surrenders before the court below and applies for bail within 60 days from today the same shall be considered and decided in view of the settled law. For a period of 60 days from today, no coercive action shall be taken/given effect to against the applicant. It is made clear that no further time will be allowed to the applicant for surrender before the court concerned.

With the above observations, the application stands disposed of.

Order Date :- 23.10.2017

Sachdeva

 

 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter