Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 2111 ALL
Judgement Date : 7 July, 2017
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 35 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 48527 of 2015 Petitioner :- Surendra Singh & Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. & 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ram Krishna Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Vikram D Chauhan Hon'ble Bharati Sapru,J.
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.
Learned counsels for both sides are present.
Shri V.D. Chauhan, learned counsel for the respondent states that the impugned recovery has been withdrawn against the petitioner and they have proceeded under the Securitization Act, therefore the writ petition has become infructuous.
It is accordingly dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 7.7.2017
pks
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!