Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 3801 ALL
Judgement Date : 29 August, 2017
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 38 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 39425 of 2017 Petitioner :- Dr. Archana Khare And 7 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Arti Raje Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Archana Singh Hon'ble Ran Vijai Singh,J.
Hon'ble Ifaqat Ali Khan,J.
Sri Manoj Nigam has filed vakalatnama on behalf of respondent no.3, which is taken on record.Smt.
Smt. Arti Raje, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the facts of this case are identical to the facts involved in Writ-A No.23432 of 2017 (Dr. Shailendra Singh And 18 others vs. State of U.P. And 2 others). This has not been disputed by learned Standing Counsel for the State as well as Sri Manoj Nigam, learned counsel for the respondent (U.P. Higher Education).
Matter requires scrutiny.
Issue notice.
Notices on behalf of respondent nos.1 and 2 have been accepted by the office of learned Chief Standing Counsel; whereas, Smt. Archana Singh has put in appearance on behalf of respondent no. 3, therefore, notices need not be served to the respondents.
Learned counsel for the respondents pray for and are granted four weeks time to file counter affidavit. Rejoinder affidavit, if any, may be filed two weeks thereafter.
List thereafter and connect alongwith Writ petition No.23433 of 2017 (Dr. Shailendra Singh And 18 others vs. State of U.P. And 2 others).
Showing the name of Sri Manoj Nigam as counsel for the respondent.
Order Date :- 29.8.2017
Swati
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!