Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 6237 ALL
Judgement Date : 28 September, 2016
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 59 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 2645 of 2016 Petitioner :- Pramod Kumar Respondent :- A.R.M., U.P.S.R.T.C., Agra And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashok Kumar,A.K. Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- Sunil Kumar Misra,Kartikeya Saran,S.C. Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Singh Baghel,J.
List is revised.
Learned counsel for the petitioner is not present. On previous occasion i.e. on 02.08.2016 he did not appear in the revised list.
The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Learned counsel for the respondent states that vide order dated 21.01.2016, the Court has also directed to produce the record. It is stated that in compliance of the said order, learned counsel for the respondent has the record. Since the petitioner is not present, there is no need to peruse the record. He is directed to send back the record to the appropriate authority.
Order Date :- 28.9.2016
AU
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!