Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 2095 ALL
Judgement Date : 29 April, 2016
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 13 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 47 of 2012 Revisionist :- Narvadeshwar And Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Pradeep Verma Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Kaushal Jayendra Thaker,J.
It is not understood as to why office has listed the matter as infructuous matter due to defect. The Court had directed Counsel for the applicant for delay condonation application which is already filed way back on 15.3.2012 pursuant to order dated 30.1.2012. Hence this application cannot be dismissed as infructuous on the defective board rather office will have to give regular number to Criminal Revision No.(47) of 2012.
Issue notice to opposite party No.2 returnable after 4 weeks.
List the matter before the regular Court and not under defective board.
Order Date :- 29.4.2016
Irshad
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!