Citation : 2014 Latest Caselaw 9203 ALL
Judgement Date : 26 November, 2014
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 22 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 3365 of 2014 Revisionist :- Anil Kumar Maurya Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Ishtiyaq Ali,Ali Hasan Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt.Advocate Hon'ble Akhtar Husain Khan,J.
Heard learned counsel for revisionist.
Perusal of impugned order shows that accused Anil Kumar Maurya is a Juvenile. Therefore his case should be tried by Juvenile Justice Board, but impugned order has not been passed by Juvenile Justice Board. The impugned order has been by Judicial Magistrate, II, Court No.18, Jaunpur.
In view of above revision is admitted.
Issue notice.
Notice for opposite party no.1 State of U.P. was accepted by learned A.G.A.
Notice shall be sent to opposite party no. 2.
Steps be taken within ten days.
List on 25.2.2015 for hearing.
In the meantime, operation of impugned order dated 30.7.2014 passed by Judicial Magistrate, II, Court No.18, Jaunpur is stayed.
Order Date :- 26.11.2014
RU
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!