Friday, 01, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Dr. Deena Nath Mishra vs Dy. Registrar Firm Societies And ...
2014 Latest Caselaw 9155 ALL

Citation : 2014 Latest Caselaw 9155 ALL
Judgement Date : 25 November, 2014

Allahabad High Court
Dr. Deena Nath Mishra vs Dy. Registrar Firm Societies And ... on 25 November, 2014
Bench: Mahesh Chandra Tripathi



HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
 
 

?Court No. - 4
 
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 62990 of 2014
 
Petitioner :- Dr. Deena Nath Mishra
 
Respondent :- Dy. Registrar Firm Societies And Chits & 2 Others
 
Counsel for Petitioner :- Arvind Nath Agrawal,Ashok Mehta
 
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
 

 
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.

Heard Ms. Ashok Mehta, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Sri Arvind Nath Agrawal and learned Standing Counsel appears for respondent no.1.

By means of present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:-

"I. A writ order or direction in the nature of certiorari quash the impugned order dated 21.03.2014 vide letter no. 7150/1-7114 passed by the Deputy Registrar Firm Societies and Chits Kanpur Mandal, Kanpur vide which the approval is sanctioned to the forged and illegal Election dated 23.07.2011 through letter no. 3606 dated 25.08.2011 under section 4 of the Societies Registration Act 1860.

II. A writ order or direction in the nature of certiorari, to quash alleged impugned election dated 31.05.2014 by which the alleged respondent no.2 is elected president and constituted the forged committee/society.

III. A writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus and commanding the respondents  to give charge to the committee of the petitioner in pursuance of this Hon'ble High Court order dated 05.10.2013 in civil misc. writ petitoner no. 42932 of 2010 inre Smt. Urmila Gour and another Vs. Khadi Evam Gramodyog & others.

IV. A writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus and commanding the respondents not to alienate and sale and transferred the possession of the property opf the society in question and not to interfere in the working of the petitioner.

V. A writ order or direction, to direct the respondent no.1 to conduct fresh election of the society by the prescribed authority further which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case with costs."

Matter requires consideration.

Issue notice to respondent nos. 2 and 3. Steps may be taken within a week, returnable at an early date. The respondents are allowed three weeks' time to file counter affidavit. The petitioner will have one week thereafter to file rejoinder affidavit. 

List this matter in the week commencing 5th January, 2015.

Order Date :- 25.11.2014/VKG

 

 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter