Citation : 2014 Latest Caselaw 258 ALL
Judgement Date : 27 March, 2014
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 33 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 271 of 2005 Petitioner :- State Of Up Thru' Principal Secy Rural Development & Another Respondent :- U.P. Public Service Tribunal And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- R.S. Parihar,G.K.Tripathi,S.C.,S.K. Garg Counsel for Respondent :- K.K. Mishra,B.N. Singh,C.P. Shukla,G.K. Tripathi,S.C. Hon'ble Rajes Kumar,J.
Hon'ble Ashwani Kumar Mishra,J.
Sri Pankaj Rai, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel, submitted that the District Rural Development Agency is a Society and is neither the State Government nor the local authority, therefore, the respondent is not a public servant and his claim is not maintainable before the Tribunal. He further submitted that the respondent was the daily wager and was not in service, and claimed regularization therefore, he also does not fall within the purview of public servant and his claim petition was not maintainable.
Since the matter raises the jurisdiction and goes into the root of the matter, we are of the view that let the parties make the pleadings in this regard and file respective affidavits.
List after two weeks.
Order Date :- 27.3.2014
OP
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!