Citation : 2014 Latest Caselaw 210 ALL
Judgement Date : 26 March, 2014
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH ?Court No. - 20 Case :- MISC. SINGLE No. - 5917 of 2012 Petitioner :- Kuldeep Narayan Tiwari & Another Respondent :- First Additional District Judge, Gonda & Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ved Prakash Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- Manish Kumar Hon'ble Dr. Devendra Kumar Arora,J.
(C.M. Application No. 30581 of 2014)
Submission of learned counsel for petitioner is that there is discrepancy in the name of opposite party no.3, in the writ petition, therefore, he moved the present application for correction.
As the correction is required in the memo of writ petition, therefore, it would be appropriate for the petitioner to move the application for amendment of the writ petition, instead of moving the application for correction.
The instant application is rejected. However, liberty is given to the petitioner to move appropriate application for amendment of the writ petition.
Order Date :- 26.3.2014
Vijay
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!