Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Gauri Shankar Misra & Another vs State Of U.P.
2014 Latest Caselaw 2239 ALL

Citation : 2014 Latest Caselaw 2239 ALL
Judgement Date : 10 June, 2014

Allahabad High Court
Gauri Shankar Misra & Another vs State Of U.P. on 10 June, 2014
Bench: Shashi Kant



HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH
 
 

?Court No. - 17
 
Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 763 of 2014
 
Appellant :- Gauri Shankar Misra & Another
 
Respondent :- State Of U.P.
 
Counsel for Appellant :- Angrej Nath Shukla
 
Counsel for Respondent :- Govt. Advocate
 

 
Hon'ble Shashi Kant,J. 

Heard learned counsel for the appellant and the learned A.G.A. representing the State of U.P..

This appeal has been filed under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C. against the judgment and order dated 19.05.2014 passed by learned Special Judge  (E.C. Act)/Additional Session Judge, Gonda in S.T. No. 232/2002, whereby the accused appellants have been convicted under Sections 307, 323, 504 and 506 I.P.C. and sentenced for offence punishable under Section 307/34 I.P.C. for 7 years rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs.5000/- each, in default of payment of fine, three months additional imprisonment and for offence punishable under Section 323/34 I.P.C. for six months imprisonment. All imprisonment were directed to run concurrently.

Learned counsel for the appellants submits that there is no injury on the vital part and no case under Section 307 I.P.C. is made out, still the learned trial court has convicted appellants illegally under Section 307 I.P.C. along with other sections.

Above submissions was opposed by the learned A.G.A.

Considering the above submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the parties and facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that the matter requires re-consideration by this Court.

Admit.

Learned A.G.A. has put in appearance for the State, therefore, there is no need to issue notice.

List in the week commencing 15th September, 2014. Meanwhile the lower court record be summoned within a period of six weeks from today through District Judge, Gonda.

In the meantime, learned A.G.A. may find out whether any Government Appeal has been filed against the impugned judgement or not ?

Order Date :- 10.6.2014

Monika

Crimianl Misc. Application No. 53937 (B) of 2014

in

Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 763 of 2014

Appellant :- Gauri Shankar Misra & Another

Respondent :- State Of U.P.

Counsel for Appellant :- Angrej Nath Shukla

Counsel for Respondent :- Govt. Advocate

Hon'ble Shashi Kant,J.

Heard learned counsel for the appellants/applicants and the learned A.G.A. representing the State of U.P.

Learned counsel for the applicants/appellants submits that the appellants/applicants are on interim bail till today. They were on bail during trial and they have not misused the bail.the accused appellants have been convicted under Sections 307, 323, 504 and 506 I.P.C. and sentenced for offence punishable under Section 307/34 I.P.C. for 7 years rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs.5000/- each, in default of payment of fine, further undergo for three months additional imprisonment and for offence punishable under Section 323/34 I.P.C. for six months imprisonment.

Learned counsel for the appellants also submits that the impugned judgment suffers from legal and factual defects and the learned trial court has not properly appreciated the evidence and committed serious legal mistakes.

Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail.

Considering the rival submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties and facts and circumstances of the case, it appears that accused appellants are entitled for bail.

Let the applicants Gauri Shankar Misra and Ram Sewak Ojha be released on bail in Sessions Trial No. 232 of 2012 in Case Crime No. 325 of 2009, under Sections 307, 323, 504 and 506 I.P.C., P.S. Carnailganj, District Gonda during the pendency of the appeal on his furnishing personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned, subject to the following conditions:-

(i) The applicants will not misuse the liberty of bail.

(ii) The applicants will fully co-operate in expeditious hearing of this appeal.

However, the fine is not stayed and the 50 per cent of the same may be deposited by the appellant, if not already deposited, within15 days from the date of release, failing which this order of bail automatically stands cancelled.

Order Date :- 10.6.2014/Monika

 

 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter