Citation : 2014 Latest Caselaw 4817 ALL
Judgement Date : 22 August, 2014
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH ?Court No. - 7 Case :- MISC. BENCH No. - 7829 of 2014 Petitioner :- Arjun Respondent :- State Of U.P., Thru. Secretary, Home & 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mahendra Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Ravindra Singh,J.
Hon'ble Vishnu Chandra Gupta,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A.
This petition has been filed by the petitioner Arjun with a prayer to quash the FIR of case crime No. 273 of 2014 under sections 354, 504, 506 IPC, P.S. Maurawan , District Unnao.
From the perusal of the FIR it appears that on the basis of allegation made therein the prima facie cognizable offence is made out. There is no scope of interfering in the FIR. Therefore, the prayer for quashing the FIR is refused.
However, considering the facts, it is directed that in case petitioner appears before the court concerned within 30 days from today and applies for bail, the same shall be heard and disposed of in view of Smt. Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P. 2005 Cr.L.J. 755 which has been approved by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Lal Kamlendra Pratap Sigh Versus State of U.P reported in 2009(4) S.C.C. 437.
With this direction, this petition is finally disposed of.
Order Date :- 22.8.2014/RPD
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!