Citation : 2014 Latest Caselaw 4768 ALL
Judgement Date : 21 August, 2014
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH ?Court No. - 24 Case :- MISC. BENCH No. - 6150 of 2004 Petitioner :- Chandrika Prasad Respondent :- Vice Chairman Lucknow Development Authority & 2 Ors Lko Counsel for Petitioner :- K.N Tewari,K.Chandra,S.L. Verma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C,U. Chandra Hon'ble Rajiv Sharma,J.
Hon'ble Mahendra Dayal,J.
Case called out.
None responds for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
Shri Shobhit Mohan Shukla has put in appearance on behalf of Lucknow Development Authority.
The petitioner who is tenure holder of Plot Nos. 33/6 and 33/7. Being inaction of the respondents in non-payment of the compensation of the acquired land of the petitioner, which was acquired in the year 1986-87 and their consequent attempt to demolish the house of the petitioner even after their admission that house of the petitioner is not damaging the Yojana concerned, the instant writ petition has been filed.
Accordingly, without entering into merit of the case, we dispose of the writ petition finally with a direction to the opposite parties to award the compensation, if there is no other legal impediment.
Order Date :- 21.8.2014
Muk
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!