Citation : 2014 Latest Caselaw 1396 ALL
Judgement Date : 30 April, 2014
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 18 Case :- WRIT - B No. - 22845 of 2014 Petitioner :- Chunku Respondent :- D.D.C. And 9 Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Amresh Chandra Upadhyay Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Anjani Kumar Mishra,J.
Supplementary affidavit filed today in Court, is taken on record.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.
It has been submitted that the petitioner's chak was modified by the order of the Settlement Officer, Consolidation against which a revision filed by the petitioner, has been dismissed on the ground that any interference in revision with effect several persons and such interference is not warranted since notification under Section 52 of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act has already been issued. It is submitted that the said grounds for dismissal of the revision are illegal.
Issue notice to the respondent nos. 4 to 10 by registered post A.D.
Steps be taken within a week.
In view of the averments made in paragraph 9 of the writ petition, the effect and operation of the impugned order dated 12.7.2011 passed by the Settlement Officer, Consolidation shall remain stayed, in case not already given effect to, on the spot.
Order Date :- 30.4.2014
Priyanka
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!