Citation : 2014 Latest Caselaw 1368 ALL
Judgement Date : 30 April, 2014
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 18 Case :- WRIT - B No. - 24558 of 2014 Petitioner :- Smt. Ansa Devi Respondent :- D.D.C. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Naveen Kr. Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mahesh Narain Singh,Surendra Pratap Singh Hon'ble Anjani Kumar Mishra,J.
After having heard Shri Ram Nath, holding brief of Shri Naveen Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner and, Shri S.P. Singh, who appears for the respondent no. 4, I am prima facie of the view, that the order impugned passed by the Deputy Director of Consolidation calls for interference.
Shri S.P. Singh, has further conceded that, it is a fit case for being remanded for reconsidering the grievance of the parties.
However, the writ petition cannot be disposed of finally in view of the fact that two private respondents, namely, respondent nos. 5 and 6 are neither served nor haveput in appearance.
Under the circumstances, the matter is being adjourned for a week to enable the parties to make an attempt to ensure that the said respondents are represented so that the writ petition can be disposed of finally.
Put up as fresh on 12th May, 2014.
Order Date :- 30.4.2014
Priyanka
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!