Citation : 2013 Latest Caselaw 4537 ALL
Judgement Date : 25 July, 2013
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH ?Court No. - 17 Case :- U/S 482/378/407 No. - 1891 of 2011 Applicant :- Mahendra Kumar Yagyasaini And Others Opposite Party :- The State Of U.P And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Vijay Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate,S P Maurya,Yugul Kishore Sharma Hon'ble Vishnu Chandra Gupta,J.
Heard learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and the learned AGA.
None is present on behalf of the petitioner.
It has been informed by the learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 that mediation has succeeded.
The settlement and agreement has been annexed as Annexue No. D to the report of mediation centre.
Hence this petition is disposed of finally with direction to the parties to file compromise arrived at in between the parties in terms of the settlement and agreement before trial court. After verification of the compromise the trial court shall proceed to accept the same in accordance with law irrespective of the fact that some of the offences are non compoundable.
Order Date :- 25.7.2013
GSY
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!