Citation : 2013 Latest Caselaw 779 ALL
Judgement Date : 11 April, 2013
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH ?Court No. - 23 Case :- SERVICE SINGLE No. - 10021 of 1993 Petitioner :- Gopi Lal Verma Respondent :- U.P. Raiya Pariwahana Nigam Lko Petitioner Counsel :- S.C. Sitapuri Respondent Counsel :- G.S. Chauhan Hon'ble Pankaj Mithal,J.
The petitioner was put in waiting list of the drivers in the year 1993. On the basis of the said waiting list prepared in the year 1993 he is not entitled to be given any appointment after such a long distance of time today. The writ petition as such is meaningless.
Shri K.B. Singh holding brief of Shri G.S.Chaunhan, learned counsel for the respondent states that the writ petition has actually become infrucutous.
No one has appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press writ petition.
In view of above, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 11.4.2013
R.U.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!