Citation : 2013 Latest Caselaw 594 ALL
Judgement Date : 9 April, 2013
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 41 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1122 of 2012 Petitioner :- Kanhaiyalal Gupta Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others Petitioner Counsel :- Mayank Bhushan Respondent Counsel :- Govt. Advocate,P.C.Dwivedi,Rajiv Nayan Singh Hon'ble Rajesh Dayal Khare,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State respondent.
The application no. 133745 of 2012 for correction is allowed.
Necessary correction has been made in the order dated 12.4.2012.
Office is directed to correct the certified copy of the order dated 12.4.2012, accordingly, as per Rules of the Court, if already issued to the learned counsel for the applicant.
The modification application accordingly disposed of.
Order Date :- 9.4.2013
Priyanka
.
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1122 of 2012
Petitioner :- Kanhaiyalal Gupta
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others
Petitioner Counsel :- Mayank Bhushan
Respondent Counsel :- Govt. Advocate,P.C.Dwivedi,Rajiv Nayan Singh
Hon'ble Rajesh Dayal Khare,J.
Counter affidavit has been filed by Sri Rajiv Nayan Singh, learned counsel for the opposite party No. 2 which is taken on record.
As prayed by learned counsel for the revisionist one week's time is granted to file rejoinder affidavit.
List thereafter before the appropriate Bench.
Order Date :- 9.4.2013
Priyanka
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!