Citation : 2013 Latest Caselaw 1029 ALL
Judgement Date : 17 April, 2013
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH ?Court No. - 23 Case :- SERVICE SINGLE No. - 3363 of 1996 Petitioner :- Bhola Nath Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others Petitioner Counsel :- S.P.Shukla,Pankaj Bajpai,Ravi Nath Tilhari Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,R.P.Singh,S.P.Singh Hon'ble Pankaj Mithal,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant.
The sole petitioner died on 18.9.2012. His heirs and legal representatives have applied for substitution. The delay in filing the substitution application is sufficiently explained.
Accordingly, delay is condoned.
Delay Condonation application no. 24931 of 2013 is allowed.
Abatement is set aside and since the substitution is formal in nature, substitution application no. 24935 of 2013 is also allowed.
Let the heirs and legal representatives of the petitioner be substituted as petitioner no. 1/1 to 1/3.
List in the next cause list.
Order Date :- 17.4.2013
SKS
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!