Friday, 01, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Bhola Nath vs State Of U.P. & Others
2013 Latest Caselaw 1029 ALL

Citation : 2013 Latest Caselaw 1029 ALL
Judgement Date : 17 April, 2013

Allahabad High Court
Bhola Nath vs State Of U.P. & Others on 17 April, 2013
Bench: Pankaj Mithal



HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH
 
 

?Court No. - 23
 

 
Case :- SERVICE SINGLE No. - 3363 of 1996
 

 
Petitioner :- Bhola Nath
 
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others
 
Petitioner Counsel :- S.P.Shukla,Pankaj Bajpai,Ravi Nath Tilhari
 
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,R.P.Singh,S.P.Singh
 

 
Hon'ble Pankaj Mithal,J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant.

The sole petitioner died on 18.9.2012. His heirs and legal representatives have applied for substitution. The delay in filing the substitution application is sufficiently explained.

Accordingly, delay is condoned.

Delay Condonation application no. 24931 of 2013 is allowed.

Abatement is set aside and since the substitution is formal in nature, substitution application no. 24935 of 2013 is also allowed.

Let the heirs and legal representatives of the petitioner be substituted as petitioner no. 1/1 to 1/3. 

List in the next cause list.

Order Date :- 17.4.2013

SKS

 

 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter