Citation : 2012 Latest Caselaw 5742 ALL
Judgement Date : 26 November, 2012
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 61156 of 2012 Petitioner :- Mahaveer Joot Mill Shiv Shakti Sharmik Sangh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Another Petitioner Counsel :- Manish Kumar Nigam,C.B. Dhar Dubey Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,Vinod Swaroop Hon'ble Rajes Kumar,J.
Mahabir Jute Mills claim that on their complaint, the petitioner's registration has been cancelled. Therefore, they are the necessary party and should be impleaded.
Let the petitioner may implead Mahabir Jute Mills as respondent no. 3 during the course of the day. The newly respondent no. 3 is represented by Sri Vinod Swarup, Advocate. He prays for and is granted a week's time to file counter affidavit. Respondent nos. 1 and 2 are represented by learned Standing Counsel. They may also file counter by that time.
Put up on 4.12.2012 as fresh before the appropriate Bench.
Order Date :- 26.11.2012
OP
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!