Citation : 2012 Latest Caselaw 3126 ALL
Judgement Date : 20 July, 2012
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 30 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 34594 of 2012 Petitioner :- Narendra Kumar Mishra Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others Petitioner Counsel :- Rang Nath Pandey Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,B.K. Yadav Hon'ble V.K. Shukla,J.
Learned standing counsel has accepted notice on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Sri B.K. Yadav, Advocate has entered appearance on behalf of respondent Nos. 3, 4 and 5.
Each one of the respondents is accorded six weeks' time to file counter affidavit. Rejoinder affidavit may be filed within next two weeks.
List this petition thereafter.
It has been contended on behalf of the petitioner that in the present case his reply qua the expenditure incurred in construction of school building has not been considered in correct perspective, and even for the work which was not got done by the petitioner, liability has been fastened upon him, and consequently, recovery is bad.
Prima facie the argument advanced by the petitioner appears to have some substance and requires consideration by this Court, as such till the next date of listing no recovery shall be made from the petitioner.
Order Date :- 20.7.2012
SRY
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!