Citation : 2012 Latest Caselaw 2638 ALL
Judgement Date : 3 July, 2012
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 31492 of 2012 Petitioner :- Smt. Reshma @ Reshmi And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others Petitioner Counsel :- P.N. Gangwar Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Amitava Lala,J.
Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Singh Baghel,J.
Despite on the repeated calls, no body is present on behalf of the petitioners before this Court to press this petition. The petitioners i.e. Girl and boy are also not present before this Court. Therefore, it can be safely presumed that the petitioners' purpose has been sub-served or they are not interested to proceed with the matter any further and the writ petition has become infructuous.
Hence, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous, however, without imposing any cost.
Order Date :- 3.7.2012
ssm
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!