Wednesday, 29, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ram Mohan Sharma And Others vs Sri A.C. Sharma I.P.S. And Another
2012 Latest Caselaw 3380 ALL

Citation : 2012 Latest Caselaw 3380 ALL
Judgement Date : 6 August, 2012

Allahabad High Court
Ram Mohan Sharma And Others vs Sri A.C. Sharma I.P.S. And Another on 6 August, 2012
Bench: Satish Chandra



HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH
 
 

?Court No. - 7
 

 
Case :- CONTEMPT No. - 1667 of 2012
 

 
Petitioner :- Ram Mohan Sharma And Others
 
Respondent :- Sri A.C. Sharma I.P.S. And Another
 
Petitioner Counsel :- Amit Bose
 

 
Hon'ble Dr. Satish Chandra,J.

Sri Abhishek Bose holding brief of Sri Amit Bose, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this Hon'ble Court in writ petition no.266 of 2012 (SS) has passed an order on 30.04.2012. The operative portion, on reproduction, reads as under:

"Accordingly, a writ in the nature of certiorari is issued quashing the impugned condition as contained in the Circular dated 22.12.2011 annexed as Annexure no.1 to the writ petition to the effect that only those candidates will be eligible for being sent to Training Course for Traffic Inspector who are less than 45 years of age as on 31.12.2012.

Further, a writ in the nature of mandamus is issued to the opposite parties to send the petitioners for Traffic Inspector Training Course as and when the same commences, if the petitioners are otherwise eligible for the same.

With the aforesaid observations and directions, the writ petition stands allowed. However, there will be no order as to cost."

Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that there is no legal impediment and petitioners are fully eligible to attend the Training Course but the opposite parties are not considering the case of the petitioner inspite of numerous representations. 

In view of above, I direct the opposite parties to  implement the order dated 30.04.2012 passed by this Court within a period of two weeks, failing which they will have to appear in person before this Court to show cause as to why the contempt  proceedings be not initiated against them for not complying the order passed by this Court.

The learned Standing Counsel shall ensure the compliance of this order.

In addition, learned counsel for the petitioner shall also inform the opposite party in writing, within a period of one week, about this order.

List on 28.08.2012 

Order Date :- 6.8.2012/VNP/-

 

 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter