Citation : 2011 Latest Caselaw 4598 ALL
Judgement Date : 13 September, 2011
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH ?Court No. - 3 Case :- SERVICE SINGLE No. - 6333 of 2011 Petitioner :- Ram Lautan Mishra Respondent :- The State Of U.P.Through The Secy. (Secondary Edu.) Lko. And Petitioner Counsel :- Pt.S.Chandra Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Shri Narayan Shukla,J.
Though the petitioner has challenged the vires of Regulations 2009, but at this stage claiming the illegality in the matter of procedure of selection, he confines his prayer for issuing direction to the Director of Education (Secondary), opposite party No.2 to take a decision in the matter, who is empowered under Regulation 15 of the Uttar Pradesh Madhyamik Sanskrit Shiksha Parishad (Sansthaon Ke Pradhanoan, Adhyapakon Evam Sansthaon Ke Anya Karamchariyon Ki Niyukti Tatha Sewa Shartein) Niyamawali, 2009. No doubt the Director of Education (Secondary), State of U.P. has been entrusted with the statutory power to examine the process of selection and if the same is found malpracticed or adulterated, he can declare the same void in exercise of power provided under Regulation 15 of the said Regulations.
Keeping in view the aforesaid provisions, I hereby dispose of the writ petition finally with the direction to the opposite party No.2 to look into the matter, before whom the petitioner shall have right to submit his grievance, and pass an appropriate order before proceeding further with the process of selection.
Order Date :- 13.9.2011
Banswar
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!