Citation : 2011 Latest Caselaw 1766 ALL
Judgement Date : 17 May, 2011
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 50 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1279 of 2011 Petitioner :- Senaihalata Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others Petitioner Counsel :- Aditya Kumar Tripathi Respondent Counsel :- Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Vinod Prasad,J.
Heard Sri A.K. Tripathi learned counsel for the revisionist and learned A.G.A.
Revisionist Snehlata is not the registered owner of the tractor in question and, therefore, she is not entitled for its release.
In view of the above, there is no error of fact or that of law in impugned order dated 2.2.2011 passed by Special Judge DAA Etawah, in Special Case No.93 of 2009 Snehlata Vs. Gyan Singh others, under Sections 395, 397 I.P.C. Police Station Civil Lines, District Etawah. This revision is dismissed.
Order Date :- 17.5.2011
rkg
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!