Friday, 24, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
BARE ACTS

Supreme Court (SC) Judgements on Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950

Bare Act Title Category / State
Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950 Bihar State Laws
 

List of Judgements

Kesavananda Bharati Sripadagalvaru and Ors vs State Of Kerala And Anr

Judgement Date : april/1973, Citation : 1973 Latest Caselaw 258 SC

Manish Kumar Vs. Union of India

Judgement Date : january/2021, Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 30 SC

Manish Kumar Vs. Union of India

Judgement Date : january/2021, Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 29 SC

Headnote :

A. The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Sections 7(1), 11, and 32A (amended by the Act of 2020) - Amendment - Malice - The amendment stipulates that a minimum of 100 allottees or 10% of the total allottees, whichever is lower, must support the application to initiate insolvency proceedings agai...

State of U.P. and Ors. Vs. Z.U. Ansari [September 30, 2016]

Judgement Date : september/2016, Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 715 SC

Madan & Anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra [DECEMBER 06, 2013]

Judgement Date : december/2013, Citation : 2013 Latest Caselaw 852 SC

Monnet Ispat and Energy Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Ors. [July 26, 2012]

Judgement Date : july/2012, Citation : 2012 Latest Caselaw 386 SC

Sharda Devi Vs. State of Bihar & ANR [2003] INSC 7 (8 January 2003)

Judgement Date : january/2003, Citation : 2003 Latest Caselaw 7 SC

Upendra Narain Singh Vs. The State of Bihar [1996] INSC 905 (7 August 1996)

Judgement Date : august/1996, Citation : 1996 Latest Caselaw 614 SC

Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. Vs. State of Bihar [1994] INSC 333 (13 May 1994)

Judgement Date : may/1994, Citation : 1994 Latest Caselaw 328 SC

Commissioner of Wealth Tax, Calcutta Vs. Smt. Anjamli Khan [1990] INSC 341 (6 November 1990)

Judgement Date : november/1990, Citation : 1990 Latest Caselaw 341 SC

Headnote :

The respondent-assessee possessed extensive agricultural lands that were transferred to the State Government under the West Bengal Estates Acquisition Act of 1953. The assessee was entitled to compensation for these lands. For the assessment years 1957-58, 1958-59, and 1959-60, the Wealth Tax Office...

Kali Prasad Agarwalla & Ors Vs. Bharat Coking Coal Limited & Ors [1989] INSC 117 (31 March 1989)

Judgement Date : march/1989, Citation : 1989 Latest Caselaw 117 SC

Headnote :

Section 3 of the Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950 establishes the transfer of an estate or tenure to the State. According to Section 2(h) of the Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Act, 1973, a \'mine\' is defined as any excavation where operations for searching for or extracting minerals have occurred or are...

State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors Vs. Radhey Shyam Nigam & Ors [1989] INSC 6 (11 January 1989)

Judgement Date : january/1989, Citation : 1989 Latest Caselaw 6 SC

Headnote :

The Uttar Pradesh Legislature passed the Uttar Pradesh Urban Planning and Development Act in 1973. Around September 11, 1974, Lucknow was officially designated as a development area through a notification. The Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act of 1984 came into effect on September 24, 1984. Notificat...

Raja Satyendra Narayan Singh & ANR Vs. State of Bihar & Ors [1987] INSC 150 (5 May 1987)

Judgement Date : may/1987, Citation : 1987 Latest Caselaw 149 SC

Headnote :

Section 3 of the Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950 stipulates that an estate or tenure can be vested in the State through a notification. According to Section 9, from the date of such vesting, all mines within the estate or tenure that were operational at the start of the Act and were being directly work...

Commissioner of Wealth Tax, Patna Vs. Raghublr Narain Singh [1984] INSC37 (20 February 1984)

Judgement Date : february/1984, Citation : 1984 Latest Caselaw 37 SC

Headnote :

The individual in question has had his estate vested in the State of Bihar as per the Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950 since July 1, 1952, and is entitled to receive compensation from the Government under this Act.During the relevant assessment years, the assessors secured two monetary decrees from his...

Commlsstoner of Wealth Tax, Bihar, Patna Vs. Maharaja Kumar Kamal Singh [1984] INSC36 (20 February 1984)

Judgement Date : february/1984, Citation : 1984 Latest Caselaw 36 SC

Headnote :

In calculating the net wealth of the respondent-assesse for wealth tax assessment under the Wealth Tax Act of 1957, the wealth tax officer included a certain amount representing the value of the assesse\'s right to compensation that had accrued to him upon the vesting of his estate in the State of B...

Western Coalfields Ltd. Vs. Special Area Development Authority, Korba & ANR [1981] INSC 194 (26 November 1981)

Judgement Date : november/1981, Citation : 1981 Latest Caselaw 194 SC

Headnote :

The Madhya Pradesh Municipalities Act of 1961, specifically Section 127(1)(i), granted municipal councils the authority to levy a tax on property owners within the municipality, based on the annual letting value of their houses, buildings, or lands, referred to as property tax.In comparison, the Mad...

Bhaiya Ramanuj Pratap Deo Vs. Lalu Maheshanuj Pratap Deo & Ors [1981] INSC 149 (26 August 1981)

Judgement Date : august/1981, Citation : 1981 Latest Caselaw 149 SC

Headnote :

Bhaiya Rudra Pratap Deo was the owner of an impartible estate known as the Nagaruntari estate, located in the Palamau district. The succession to this estate was determined by the principle of lineal primogeniture, which stipulated that the eldest male member of the eldest line would inherit the est...

Harcharan Singh Vs. Shiv Rani & Ors [1981] INSC 44 (20 February 1981)

Judgement Date : february/1981, Citation : 1981 Latest Caselaw 44 SC

Headnote :

The appellant was established as a tenant of the premises in 1964, with an annual rent due by December 31 each year. However, the appellant failed to pay rent for 1965 and 1966, prompting the respondents to send a combined notice on November 9, 1966, via registered post, demanding payment of the ove...

State of U.P. Vs. Synthetics & Chemicals Ltd. & Ors [1979] INSC 267 (19 December 1979)

Judgement Date : december/1979, Citation : 1979 Latest Caselaw 267 SC

Headnote :

The licensees involved in the wholesale sale of denatured spirit argued in their petitions to the High Court that the imposition of fees on denatured spirit was unwarranted for two reasons: (i) the State was not offering any services to the trade, and (ii) only Parliament has the authority to impose...

Ramesh Bejoy Sharma & Ors Vs. Pashupati Rai & Ors [1979] INSC 120 (17 July 1979)

Judgement Date : july/1979, Citation : 1979 Latest Caselaw 120 SC

Headnote :

In a lawsuit initiated against the defendants for the recovery of possession of certain lands, the plaintiffs claimed that these lands were privately owned by the proprietor and that they had been in actual cultivating possession of the lands for an extended period. The trial court dismissed the cas...

Sone Valley Portland Cement Co. Ltd. Vs. The General, Mining Syndicate Pvt. Ltd. [1976] INSC 198 (24 August 1976)

Judgement Date : august/1976, Citation : 1976 Latest Caselaw 198 SC

Headnote :

The owner of extensive land leased parcels to lessees at a predetermined rate of royalty and rent. The lessees then sub-leased the land to the appellant, who agreed to pay the lessees the same royalty and rent that they owed to the owner. Additionally, they consented to pay an extra royalty to the h...

State of Bihar & ANR Vs. Khas Karanpura Collieries Ltd. [1976] INSC 171 (6 August 1976)

Judgement Date : august/1976, Citation : 1976 Latest Caselaw 171 SC

Headnote :

Before October 25, 1949, owners of large estates often granted mining leases either without any royalty payments or at very minimal rates. Typically, the lessees would also issue sub-leases under similar conditions. The Mines and Mine (Regulation and Development) Act of 1948 prohibited the granting...

State of Haryana & ANR Vs. Chanan Mal [1976] INSC 58 (18 March 1976)

Judgement Date : march/1976, Citation : 1976 Latest Caselaw 58 SC

Headnote :

The State Government claimed ownership of saltpetre deposits based on entries in the village administration documents (wajib-ul-arz) of certain villages. It issued a notification designating saltpetre as a minor mineral and proceeded to auction the mines in accordance with the Punjab Minor Minerals...

Lachmi Narain Vs. Union of India & Ors [1975] INSC 288 (25 November 1975)

Judgement Date : november/1975, Citation : 1975 Latest Caselaw 286 SC

Headnote :

Section 2 of the Part States (Laws) Act, 1950, granted the Central Government the authority to extend any existing law from a Part A State to any Part C State, or any portion thereof, through a notification in the official gazette, with any modifications or restrictions it deemed appropriate. In 195...

Gurucharan Singh Vs. Kamla Singh & Ors [1975] INSC 205 (9 September 1975)

Judgement Date : september/1975, Citation : 1975 Latest Caselaw 203 SC

Headnote :

Section 3 of the Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950, transfers all interests in estates or tenures held by a proprietor or tenure-holder to the State, effective from a date specified under section 4. Section 6 excludes certain lands from this transfer, specifically retaining the bakasht lands in the Khas...

Krishna Chandra Gangopadhyaya Vs. Union of India & Ors [1975] INSC 98 (18 April 1975)

Judgement Date : april/1975, Citation : 1975 Latest Caselaw 98 SC

Headnote :

This Court, in the case of Baij Nath Kedia, ruled that the second proviso to section 10(2) of the Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950, was unconstitutional. The Court found that the Bihar Legislature lacked the authority to enact this provision, asserting that only Parliament had the competence to legislat...

M/S. Hindustan Steel Limited, Rourkela Vs. Smt. Kalyani Banerjee & Ors [1972]291 (4 December 1972)

Judgement Date : december/1972, Citation : 1972 Latest Caselaw 291 SC

Headnote :

The initial owner of an Estate granted a mining lease to Pran Chatterjee in 1919. Chatterjee transferred his interest to Mukherjee in 1937. The original petitioners, as heirs and successors of Mukherjee, issued a sub-lease to Rungta in 1951. In 1955, the Estate was transferred to the State of Bihar...

Kunjukutty Sahib Vs. State Kerala & ANR [1972] INSC 121 (26 April 1972)

Judgement Date : april/1972, Citation : 1972 Latest Caselaw 121 SC

Headnote :

The Kerala Land Reforms Act of 1963 (Act 1 of 1964) was initially included in the Ninth Schedule of the Constitution, thereby receiving protection under Article 31-B. However, the subsequent amendment, the Kerala Land Reforms (Amendment) Act of 1969, was not included in the Ninth Schedule. The valid...

Chander Sekhar Singh Boi Vs. The State of Orissa [1971] INSC 305 (5 November 1971)

Judgement Date : november/1971, Citation : 1971 Latest Caselaw 305 SC

Headnote :

According to the Orissa Land Reforms Act of 1965, the Orissa Land Reforms Act of 1960 was revised by replacing the original Chapters III and IV with new versions. Notifications issued under section 1(3) of the Act allowed for different effective dates for various provisions, and thus, the amended Ch...

Bhubaneshwar Prasad Narain Singh & Ors Vs. Sidheswar Mukherjee & Ors [1971] INSC 43 (2 February 1971)

Judgement Date : february/1971, Citation : 1971 Latest Caselaw 43 SC

Headnote :

A preliminary decree was issued in a partition suit concerning bakash land. The defendants-appellants, who claimed to be in actual possession of the bakasht land, submitted a petition arguing that section 6 of the Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950 (which had come into effect in the meantime) resulted in...

Kanpur Sugar Works Ltd. Vs. State of Bihar & Ors [1970] INSC 55 (6 March 1970)

Judgement Date : march/1970, Citation : 1970 Latest Caselaw 55 SC

Headnote :

The appellant was engaged in the business of manufacture of sugar, in the respondent-State. It was in possession of Zamindari property. Part of the area in its possession consisted of two enclosures The factory buildings were situated in the inner enclosure and the outer was used for residential qua...

Gopi Krishna Kanoria Vs. Draupadi Sahaya & Ors [1970] INSC 30 (23 February 1970)

Judgement Date : february/1970, Citation : 1970 Latest Caselaw 30 SC

Headnote :

The respondents held land from the appellant under a Mokurrari tenure (permanent lease) established by a registered document dated October 29, 1885. This document stipulated that the proprietor could terminate the lease if the tenure holder defaulted on the payment of \'four successive kists.\' Afte...

Jamshed Jahan Begam & Ors Vs. Lakhan Lal & Ors [1969] INSC 259 (25 September 1969)

Judgement Date : september/1969, Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 259 SC

Headnote :

The appellants\' predecessors-in-interest were landlords who owned an estate comprising agricultural land, trees, and groves in Uttar Pradesh, and they were significantly in debt to the respondents, with most debts being secured. Following an application from the landlords, proceedings were initiate...

Baijnath Kedia Vs. State of Bihar & Ors [1969] INSC 208 (28 August 1969)

Judgement Date : august/1969, Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 208 SC

Headnote :

Entry 54 of the Union List I in the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution grants authority for the regulation of mines and mineral development, as long as such regulation and development are deemed necessary in the public interest by law enacted by Parliament.In the Federal List I of the Government o...

Budhan Singh & ANR Vs. Nabi Bux & ANR [1969] INSC 193 (20 August 1969)

Judgement Date : august/1969, Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 193 SC

Headnote :

The respondents, who are the Ryots of the appellants, were granted a village site by the appellants\' ancestors over sixty years ago, where they built their homes.During the riots of 1947, the respondents temporarily left the village for safety and returned in 1949, only to discover that their resid...

Shivashankar Prasad Shah & Ors Vs. Baikunth Nath Singh & Ors [1969] INSC 61 (7 March 1969)

Judgement Date : march/1969, Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 61 SC

Headnote :

Following the appellants\' acquisition of a preliminary decree (as mortgagees of an Estate that included both Bakasht lands and other properties), the Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950 was enacted. The appellants subsequently filed a petition for a final decree. The mortgaged Estate was vested in the Sta...

Raja Bahadur Giriwar Prasad Narain Singh Vs. Dukhu Lal Das & Ors [1967] INSC 121 (20 April 1967)

Judgement Date : april/1967, Citation : 1967 Latest Caselaw 121 SC

Headnote :

The plaintiff-respondents secured a lease from defendant 1-appellant for certain rights in the estate of defendant 1 and paid the lease amount. Following a notification published in the Official Gazette, the estate of defendant 1-appellant was transferred to defendant 2-State under the Bihar Land Re...

I.C. Golaknath & Ors Vs. State of Punjab & Anrs [1967] INSC 45 (27 February 1967)

Judgement Date : february/1967, Citation : 1967 Latest Caselaw 45 SC

Headnote :

The validity of the Punjab Security of Land Tenures Act, 1953 (Act 10 of 1953) and of the Mysore Land Reforms Act (Act 10 of 1962) as amended by Act 14 of 1965 was challenged by the petitioners under Art. 32 of the Constitution. Since these Acts were included in the 9th Schedule to the Constitution...

Raj Kishore Prasad Narain Singh Vs. Ram Partap Pandey & Ors [1966] INSC 248 (7 November 1966)

Judgement Date : november/1966, Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 251 SC

Headnote :

The appellant secured a usufructuary mortgage from the respondents in 1925 concerning three groups of properties in Bihar: (a) five milkiat properties; (b) a three-story house located in Gaya; and (c) certain bakasht lands. Due to a notification issued under section 3 of the Bihar Land Reforms Act,...

Bihar Mines Ltd. Vs. Union of India [1966] INSC 195 (3 October 1966)

Judgement Date : october/1966, Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 196 SC

Headnote :

A lease for specific lands in the Palganj estate of Bihar was issued by the Zamindar in 1928, lasting for 49 years.This lease was intended for the extraction of soapstone, kaolin, and other minerals.Sub-leases were granted in 1933, 1934, and 1954, with the final one benefiting the appellants. Follow...

Dr. G.H. Grant Vs. State of Bihar [1965] INSC 88 (30 March 1965)

Judgement Date : march/1965, Citation : 1965 Latest Caselaw 88 SC

Headnote :

The appellant owned certain lands in Bihar, which were subject to proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act. According to Section 11 of the Act, the Collector determined the area of land to be acquired, the compensation amount, and allocated the compensation between the appellant and the village co...

Ram Ran Bijai Singh & Ors Vs. Behari Singh Alias Bagandha Singh [1963] INSC 119 (25 April 1963)

Judgement Date : april/1963, Citation : 1963 Latest Caselaw 143 SC

Headnote :

The ancestors of the appellants had executed a registered rehan bond for the suit land along with other properties. In 1941, the appellants settled the outstanding amount on the rehan bond and marked it as satisfied. Following the redemption of the bond, the appellants attempted to reclaim possessio...

Surajnath Ahir & Ors Vs. Prithinath Singh & Ors [1962] INSC 203 (4 May 1962)

Judgement Date : may/1962, Citation : 1962 Latest Caselaw 203 SC

Headnote :

After the mortgages were redeemed, the trial court determined that the plaintiff respondents did not have a valid title to the lands and that the case was barred by adverse possession and limitation.Upon appeal by the plaintiff respondents, the High Court ruled in their favor, stating that the defen...

Prithi Nath Singh & Ors Vs. Suraj Ahir & Ors [1962] INSC 202 (4 May 1962)

Judgement Date : may/1962, Citation : 1962 Latest Caselaw 202 SC

Headnote :

The current petitioners were the respondents in C. A. No. 533/60, while the current respondents were the appellants in that case. This Court allowed the appeal on the basis that the respondents had forfeited their right to reclaim possession from the appellants due to the estate vesting in the State...

Krishna Prasad & Ors Vs. Gauri Kumari Devi [1962] INSC 83 (5 March 1962)

Judgement Date : march/1962, Citation : 1962 Latest Caselaw 83 SC

Headnote :

The appellant secured a preliminary decree concerning an unusual mortgage on a share of the Zamindari village of Sonchari Mouza in the Patna District, along with khudkasht land associated with the Mouza. This decree included a directive for a personal decree for the outstanding balance, leading to a...

Raja Sailendra Narayan Bhanj Deo Vs. Kumar Jagat Kishore Prasad Narayan Singh [1961] INSC 355 (13 December 1961)

Judgement Date : december/1961, Citation : 1961 Latest Caselaw 355 SC

Headnote :

K, the mortgagee of certain Mokarrari tenures, obtained a decree on his mortgage and initiated execution. While the execution was pending, C, the mortgagor, failed to pay the rent for the mortgaged tenures and others, making them subject to sale for the recovery of the rent arrears under a certifica...

State of Bihar & ANR Vs. Umesh Jha [1961] INSC 209 (3 May 1961)

Judgement Date : may/1961, Citation : 1961 Latest Caselaw 209 SC

Headnote :

Section 4(h) of the Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950, as modified by the Bihar Land Reforms (Amendment) Act, 1959, grants the Collector the authority to invalidate anticipatory land transfers intended to undermine the Act\'s purpose. This provision is safeguarded by Article 31A of the Constitution, even...

State of Bihar Vs. Rameshwar Pratap Narain Singh& Ors [1961] INSC 183 (25 April 1961)

Judgement Date : april/1961, Citation : 1961 Latest Caselaw 183 SC

Headnote :

Following the transfer of estates and tenures from proprietors or tenureholders to the State under the Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950, the Revenue Authorities began to interfere with the rights of these former proprietors and tenure holders to conduct Melas on lands they subsequently occupied as occup...

The State of Bihar Vs. Rani Sonabati Kumari [1960] INSC 155 (20 September 1960)

Judgement Date : september/1960, Citation : 1960 Latest Caselaw 155 SC

Headnote :

The respondent initiated legal action against the State of Bihar, seeking a declaration that the Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950 was ultra vires, void, and unconstitutional. Additionally, she requested a permanent injunction to prevent the State and its officials from issuing any notifications regardin...

Thakur Manmohan Deo & ANR Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors [1960] INSC 153 (19 September 1960)

Judgement Date : september/1960, Citation : 1960 Latest Caselaw 153 SC

Headnote :

The appellants were holders of ghatwali tenures known as Rohini and Pathrole ghatwalis, which were regulated by Bengal Regulation XXIX of 1814. The Bihar Land Reforms Act of 1950 was enacted by the Bihar State Legislature and took effect on September 25, 1950. In the lawsuits filed by the appellants...

Gullapalli Nageswara Rao & Ors Vs. Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport corporation & ANR [1958] INSC 110 319 (5 November 1958)

Judgement Date : november/1958, Citation : 1958 Latest Caselaw 110 SC

Headnote :

In an effort to nationalize road transport services as outlined in Chapter IV A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 (IV of 1939), which was amended by Act 100 of 1956, the General Manager of the Andhra State Transport Undertaking published a scheme in the Official Gazette under section 68C of the Act an...

Raja Bahadur Kamakshya Narainsingh & Ors Vs. The Collector And Deputy Commissioner of Hazaribagh [1955] INSC 59 (28 October 1955)

Judgement Date : october/1955, Citation : 1955 Latest Caselaw 59 SC

Headnote :

On December 29, 1947, petitioner No. 1 entered into a lease agreement with C (a company) for certain properties, including lands and buildings that were part of his estate. In 1949, he executed a deed of settlement, transferring the properties to three trustees: himself, and petitioners 2 and 3. The...

Motipur Zamindari Co. Ltd. Vs. The State of Bihar & ANR [1953] INSC 37 (17 April 1953)

Judgement Date : april/1953, Citation : 1953 Latest Caselaw 37 SC

Headnote :

The term \"person\" as used in the definitions of \"proprietor\" and \"tenure-holder\" in Sections 2(o) and 2(r) of the Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950, includes companies incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1913.There is no contradiction in the subject or context of the Act that would exclude...

The State of Bihar Vs. Maharajadhiraja Sir Kameshwar Singhof Darbhanga & Ors [1952] INSC 39 (27 May 1952)

Judgement Date : may/1952, Citation : 1952 Latest Caselaw 39 SC

Headnote :

Held per Curiam (MAHAJAN, MUKHERJEA, and CHANDRASEKHARA AIYAR JJ.)--The Bihar Land Reforms Act, XXX of 1950, is not unconstitutional or void except with respect to the provisions in Section 4(b) and Section 23(f). The provisions of Section 4(b) and Section 23(f) are unconstitutional. Per PATANJALI...

Visweshwar Rao Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh [1952] INSC 38 (27 May 1952)

Judgement Date : may/1952, Citation : 1952 Latest Caselaw 38 SC

Headnote :

Held by the Full Court (PATANJALI SASTRI C.J., MAHAJAN, MUKHERJEA, DAS, and CHANDRASEKHARA AIYAR JJ.)--The Madhya Pradesh Abolition of Proprietary Rights (Estates, Mahals, Alienated Lands) Act (1 of 1951) is entirely valid. In light of Articles 31(4), 31-A, and 31-B of the Constitution, the court la...

Ram Ran Bijai Singh & Ors Vs. Behari Singh Alias Bagandha Singh [1963] INSC 119 (25 April 1963)

Judgement Date : april/1963, Citation : 1963 Latest Caselaw 97 SC

Headnote :

The appellants\' ancestors had executed a registered rehan bond for the suit land along with other lands. In 1941, the appellants paid off the outstanding amount on the rehan bond and obtained satisfaction of the bond. After redeeming the bond, the appellants sought possession of the suit land. The...