April,13,2016:
With around 10 states reeling under drought, the Supreme Court on Tuesday asked the Centre why the natural calamity could not be brought under the Disaster Management Act to release funds for the welfare of affected families.
A Bench of Justices Madan B Lokur and N V Ramana mooted the idea after noting that many states had not declared drought.
The Centre informed the court that its hands were tied and it could not force states to declare a drought as the matter came within their domain.
"Assuming that there is a gross problem in states and people are suffering due to drought, then can the Centre say it cannot intervene and do anything?" the bench asked
The Centre objected to the court’s proposal to have a rapporteur conduct a field survey of the situation in the affected States, saying this would only add to the confusion and create a parallel government. The law officer instead suggested that the apex court itself monitor the situation by issuing mandamus.
This annoyed the apex court, which said “when we pass directions, you say we are encroaching. It is an overreach. If we don't do anything, the citizens would say we are not doing anything.”
In the previous hearing on a PIL filed by NGO Swaraj Abhiyan to declare drought as a national emergency, the court had slammed the Gujarat and Haryana governments for “hazy” presentation of facts and outdated charts on rainfall data.
The Bench had voiced its exasperation over the lack of updated data on rainfall and water scarcity, and asked the States if they were even remotely serious about people.
6.4.2016- Bombay HC feels watering Cricket pitches in drought hit Maharashtra is criminal wastage of Water
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!