April,18,2016:
The Uttarakhand high court on Monday asked the Centre whether it was not "totally extraneous" for the Union government to be concerned over the disqualification of nine rebel MLAs and to "interfere" in the affairs of the state which has to be done only in "extraordinary instances".
"What is passing through our mind is, is it the lookout of the Central government as to what would have happened on March 28 (when floor test was to be held) in view of the changed composition and in view of the nine ousted MLAs...?
"Will it not be totally extraneous for Central government, which is ruled by another political party, to be concerned by changed composition...," a bench of Chief Justice KM Joseph and Justice VK Bist asked attorney general Mukul Rohatgi.
The bench was hearing a writ petition of the ousted chief minister Harish Rawat plea challenging imposition of President's rule on March 26.
The bench said it (the demand for division of votes in the assembly when appropriation Bill was introduced) was only a "solitary instance" and added "this is what is colouring our minds. Can one solitary instance topple a democratically-elected government in its fourth-fifth year... root of the matter is you are cutting at root of democracy".
Related News @ LatestLaws.in-
30.3.2016- Another twist to Political developments in Uttarakhand, HC DB stays Single Judge’s Floor Test Order
29.3.2016- SC avoid urgent hearing on Uttrakhand, but HC rescues ousted CM Rawat with Floor Test on 31st
26.3.2016- After Congress fails to win back Uttarakhand rebel MLAs, it is pinning hope on Anti-Defection Law
‘Anti-Defection Law’ in India: Everything You need to know, Challenges and Journey so far
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!