Sunday, 03, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
BARE ACTS

Supreme Court (SC) Judgements on CrPC Section 421. Warrant for levy of fine

Bare Act Title Category / State
CrPC Section 421. Warrant for levy of fine Criminal Laws
 

List of Judgements

RAJNESH vs. NEHA

Judgement Date : november/2020, Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 594 SC

Headnote :

IMPORTANTInterim Maintenance - Maintenance under Section 125 of the Cr.PC shall be granted from the date the application for maintenance is filed.IMPORTANTSubsequent Maintenance Claims - It is essential for the applicant to reveal any prior proceedings and the orders issued in subsequent cases.IMPOR...

RAMESAN vs. STATE OF KERALA

Judgement Date : january/2020, Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 63 SC

Headnote :

IMPORTANTIn cases involving a composite sentence of imprisonment and a fine, the appeal does not become void upon the death of the accused.According to Section 394 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, and Section 55 of the Kerala Abkari Act, 1077, the death of the accused does not lead to the abate...

G.J. Raja v. Tejraj Surana

Judgement Date : july/2019, Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 605 SC

Headnote :

The Negotiable Instruments Act of 1881, specifically Section 143A (added by the Amendment Act of 2018), along with Section 421 of the Criminal Procedure Code of 1973, provides for the possibility of directing interim compensation. Before this provision was added, there was no legal framework that al...

Kumaran Vs. State of Kerala & ANR. [May 5, 2017]

Judgement Date : may/2017, Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 415 SC

K.A.Abbas H.S.A. Vs. Sabu Joseph & ANR. [2010] INSC 389 (11 May 2010)

Judgement Date : may/2010, Citation : 2010 Latest Caselaw 382 SC

Vijayan Vs. Sadanandan K. & ANR. [2009] INSC 907 (5 May 2009)

Judgement Date : may/2009, Citation : 2009 Latest Caselaw 453 SC

Dagadu Vs. State of Maharashtra [1981] INSC 75 (24 March 1981)

Judgement Date : march/1981, Citation : 1981 Latest Caselaw 75 SC

Headnote :

Under section 421 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 (now section 384 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973), the High Court has the clear authority to dismiss a first appeal against an accused\'s conviction summarily. However, in serious cases, such as those under section 302 of the Indian P...

Munir Sayed Ibna Hussain Vs. The State of Maharashtra & ANR [1975] INSC 276 (12 November 1975)

Judgement Date : november/1975, Citation : 1975 Latest Caselaw 274 SC

Headnote :

The appellant, who owns a hotel, was charged alongside five others for forcibly evicting the complainant, who served as the hotel\'s manager, and for misappropriating certain assets, including money belonging to the complainant. The appellant contended that the complainant was only a licensee. The T...

Dhondiba Gundu Pomaje & Ors Vs. The State of Maharashtra [1974] INSC 179 (17 September 1974)

Judgement Date : september/1974, Citation : 1974 Latest Caselaw 177 SC

Headnote :

According to the Constitution, any individual dissatisfied with a High Court order can appeal to the Supreme Court for special leave under Article 136. Given the longstanding precedent starting from [1953] S.C.R. 809, which discourages dismissing cases with a simple \'dismissed\', it is essential fo...

Krishna Vithu Suroshe Vs. State of Maharashtra [1973] INSC 157 (30 August 1973)

Judgement Date : august/1973, Citation : 1973 Latest Caselaw 157 SC

Headnote :

The appellant was found guilty of murder by the Trial Court.He filed an appeal with the High Court, arguing, among other points, that two eyewitnesses did not identify him as the perpetrator of the crime. The High Court rejected the appeal outright.This Court has now granted the appeal,

Mustaq Ahmed Mohed Hussain Mukhtar Hussain Ali Hussain Vs. The State of Gujarat [1973] INSC 45 (13 March 1973)

Judgement Date : march/1973, Citation : 1973 Latest Caselaw 45 SC

Headnote :

In this appeal by special leave, the primary issue to be resolved was whether the High Court of Gujarat acted appropriately in summarily dismissing the appellants\' appeal against their conviction by the Sessions Judge in Jamnagar for offenses under Section 420 in conjunction with Sections 511 and 3...

Govinda Kadtuji Kadam & Ors Vs. The State of Maharashtra [1970] INSC 17 (9 February 1970)

Judgement Date : february/1970, Citation : 1970 Latest Caselaw 17 SC

Headnote :

The four appellants, together with K, were tried and convicted for offenses under section 147 of the IPC. They collectively filed an appeal to the High Court using a single memorandum. The High Court accepted K\'s appeal but dismissed the appellants\' appeal outright.In their appeal to this Court, t...

Nlrbhay Singh Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh [1968] INSC 265 (30 October 1968)

Judgement Date : october/1968, Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 265 SC

Headnote :

The appellant was tried for the death of his mother, which he caused by inflicting injuries with a spear. The Sessions Judge found the appellant guilty of culpable homicide not amounting to murder and sentenced him to seven years of rigorous imprisonment. He subsequently filed an appeal from prison,...

Narayan Swami Vs. State of Maharashtra [1967] INSC 243 (26 October 1967)

Judgement Date : october/1967, Citation : 1967 Latest Caselaw 243 SC

Headnote :

During the trial for a dacoity offense, one witness provided false testimony and later admitted, upon further questioning, that he did so at the request of the investigating Sub-inspector. The Court issued a notice to the Sub-inspector to explain why a complaint should not be filed against him for v...

Pratap Singh Vs. The State of Vindhya Pradesh (Now Madhya Pradesh) [1960] INSC 204 (18 November 1960)

Judgement Date : november/1960, Citation : 1960 Latest Caselaw 204 SC

Headnote :

The appellant submitted an appeal while incarcerated, which was promptly dismissed on its merits. Subsequently, he filed a Memorandum of Appeal through a lawyer, but it was rejected on the basis that it was not permissible since his earlier appeal from jail under Section 420 of the Code of Criminal...

The State of Uttar Pradesh Vs. C. Tobit & Ors [1958] INSC 9 (14 February 1958)

Judgement Date : february/1958, Citation : 1958 Latest Caselaw 9 SC

Headnote :

The term \'Copy\' as used in section 419 of the Code of Criminal Procedure refers to a certified copy. Therefore, any appeal petition submitted under this section must include a certified copy of the judgment or order being appealed.This is supported by the case of Ram Lal v. Ghanasham Das, A.I.R. (...