Recently, the Supreme Court has refused to dilute strict directions issued against a Uttar Pradesh court clerk who misused court machinery to dispossess a woman and her children of their home, observing that uncompromising orders are sometimes essential to protect public confidence in the justice system.
The case stemmed from an abuse of access within the trial court, where a court clerk allegedly exploited a man’s vulnerability to secure a sale deed for part of an undivided ancestral property and then leveraged judicial orders to enforce it. The Allahabad High Court found that the clerk, aided by procedural shortcuts and police action, had forcibly evicted the man’s wife and children despite clear defects in title and the absence of co-sharers as parties.
Viewing the episode as a breakdown of institutional integrity, the High Court ordered restoration of possession within 48 hours, imposed monetary compensation, and recommended disciplinary action against both the clerk and the civil judge involved. The clerk challenged these directions before the Apex Court, arguing that the High Court’s response was excessive.
The Bench led by Chief Justice Surya Kant declined to interfere, holding that internal corruption within courts warrants a firm response. Emphasising the need to preserve institutional credibility, the Court observed, “We must send the right message,” adding that failure to act decisively would erode public trust. The Bench noted that it was extraordinary for a civil court to grant relief on the very day a suit was filed and without notice to necessary parties, calling the process itself deeply suspect.
Concluding that the High Court’s directions were proportionate to the gravity of the misconduct, the Apex Court dismissed the appeal and allowed all remedial and disciplinary measures to stand.
Disclaimer: This news/ article includes information received via a syndicated news feed. The original rights remain with the respective publisher.
Picture Source :
