In a significant judgement, the Meghalaya High Court has held that a 16-year-old is capable of making a conscious decision regarding an act of sexual intercourse. The court made this observation while quashing an FIR for offences under Sections 3 and 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, which pertained to penetrative sexual assault on a minor.
The case was brought before the bench of Justice W. Diengdoh, where the petitioner sought the quashing of the FIR, claiming that the act was consensual as the petitioner and the alleged victim were in a romantic relationship.
Taking into consideration the physical and mental development of an adolescent of that age group, the court concluded that individuals around 16 years old are capable of making conscious decisions regarding their well-being in terms of sexual intercourse. The court referred to a previous ruling by the Madras High Court in the case of Vijayalakshmi and Another v. State Rep. by Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station (2021) to support its decision.
According to reports, the petitioner, who was employed in various households, became acquainted with the alleged victim. It was alleged that they engaged in sexual intercourse at the petitioner's uncle's house. The following day, the minor girl's mother filed a case against the man under Section 363 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act 2012.
The petitioner argued that the alleged incident should not be considered as sexual assault since the survivor herself explicitly stated in her Section 164 CrPC statement and during her testimony in court that she was the petitioner's girlfriend. She affirmed that the sexual intercourse took place with her consent and that no force was employed.
After carefully examining the petitioner's submissions and legal precedents, the court found that the survivor's statement supported the petitioner's claim, despite her being a minor at approximately 16 years of age. The court emphasized the importance of considering the physical and mental development of individuals in this age group and concluded that they are capable of making informed decisions regarding sexual intercourse.
This ruling by the Meghalaya High Court provides an important perspective on the capacity of adolescents to make conscious decisions in matters related to sexual activity, highlighting the need for a nuanced understanding of consent and personal agency.
Picture Source :
