Recently, the Allahabad High Court stated that existing legal provisions are already available to address incidents involving insult to Hindu deities and sacred scriptures, while disposing of a Public Interest Litigation filed by Hindu Front for Justice. The Bench remarked that if the petitioner desired stronger or more effective legislation, the appropriate step would be to approach the Central and State Governments directly with such a request.
The case stemmed from a PIL filed by the Hindu Front for Justice before the Lucknow Bench of the Allahabad High Court, comprising Justice Rajan Roy and Justice Indrajit Shukla, heard on December 5, 2025. The Petitioner sought directions for stronger statutory measures to curb alleged instances of insult or disrespect toward Hindu deities and religious scriptures. However, during the hearing, the Court observed that the petition did not cite any specific incident and was instead based on general references asserting that such acts occur frequently.
Advocate Ranjana Agnihotri, the Counsel of the Petitioner, submitted that incidents involving disrespect or insult to Hindu deities and religious scriptures occur repeatedly. She argued that there are no sufficient legal safeguards in place to prevent these acts, although she also acknowledged that some laws are already available to address such conduct. The request before the Court was for directions compelling governmental authorities to take strict action or frame stronger mechanisms to curb such incidents.
On the other hand, the State opposed the plea and maintained that no specific incident or legal violation had been placed on record by the petitioner. It was submitted that, in the absence of identifiable facts or a concrete grievance, no judicial intervention was warranted.
The Bench examined the submissions and observed that the petition relied only on general examples rather than a specific complaint or event. The Court recorded that the petitioner herself admitted that certain legal provisions already exist to address such conduct, contradicting the assertion of complete legal absence. The Court noted that “There are already laws to check incidents of insult to Hindu deities and religious books.” It emphasised that if the petitioner wished stricter or more comprehensive provisions, such concerns may be formally presented before the relevant government authorities.
The Court disposed of the petition and granted the petitioner the liberty to submit a representation before the Central or State Governments. The Court clarified that, in the absence of a specific incident or identifiable legal breach, the Court would not issue directions on broad or generalised assertions, especially where legal remedies already exist.
Source Link
Picture Source :
