A recent ruling by the Bombay High Court at Goa has sparked a crucial debate over the eligibility of Christian members of other backward classes (OBC) for reservation benefits. The court's decision, delivered in response to a case brought by Uday Chari, has implications for the inclusion of Christian counterparts within the OBC category. The verdict underscores the necessity of explicit government notifications in determining eligibility for quota benefits.
The case revolved around Hansel Fernandes, an Aam Aadmi Party candidate who secured victory in the zilla panchayat elections from the Benaulim constituency in south Goa. Fernandes, a Christian belonging to the Mesta (carpenter) caste, faced a challenge to his caste certificate by Uday Chari. Chari contended that Fernandes's caste certificate was invalid as the government notification granting OBC status to the Mesta community did not extend the same status to Christians.
The caste scrutiny committee (CSC) had earlier upheld the validity of Fernandes's caste certificate, a decision that the Bombay High Court ultimately concurred with. However, the court's judgment clarified that its ruling pertained solely to Fernandes's case and should not be construed as a blanket rule.
The court delved into the complexities of the issue, recognizing that the Christian community in Goa ordinarily does not follow a caste system. Yet, for historical reasons, certain communities have been specifically included in government notifications that formulate the state list of OBCs, SCs, STs, and more. In each of these notifications, the inclusion of Christian members is explicitly stated where the government intended them to be part of the reserved category.
The high court cited numerous examples where government notifications clearly included the expression 'including Christian' to signify the incorporation of Christian community members within the OBC category. The court pointed out that this phrasing was used whenever Christians were intended to be included in the state list of OBCs.
Crucially, the court highlighted that since no such expression was used in the notification granting OBC status to the Mesta community, it could be inferred that the government did not intend to include Christian Mesta individuals in the OBC category.
While the verdict settled the matter for Hansel Fernandes's case, legal experts anticipate that the decision will set a precedent and stimulate discussions on the need for precise government notifications to ensure clarity regarding reservation eligibility for Christian members of OBCs.
Source: Link
Picture Source :
