Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

WPSS/499/2024
2025 Latest Caselaw 4048 UK

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 4048 UK
Judgement Date : 2 September, 2025

Uttarakhand High Court

WPSS/499/2024 on 2 September, 2025

Author: Manoj Kumar Tiwari
Bench: Manoj Kumar Tiwari
                                                                           2025:UHC:7764
              Office Notes,
             reports, orders
             or proceedings
SL.
      Date    or directions                    COURT'S OR JUDGE'S ORDERS
No.
             and Registrar's
               order with
               Signatures
                               WPSS 499/2024
                               Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.

Mr. Vinod Tiwari, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Rajeev Singh Bisht, Additional CSC, for the State.

(2) Petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 24.8.2020, passed by Director General, Medical, Health and Family Welfare. By the said order, petitioner's claim for compassionate appointment was rejected on the ground that his two siblings are employed under the State Government. Petitioner has challenged the said order on the ground that as per Rule 5(1) of The U.P. Recruitment of Dependants of Government Servants Dying in Harness Rules, 1974, which is applicable in State of Uttarakhand also, dependant of a deceased government servant can be denied compassionate appointment only if spouse of the deceased employee is in government employment. Rule 5 of the said rules is reproduced below:

"5. Recruitment of a member of the family of the deceased.--(1) In case a Government servant dies in harness after the commencement of these rules and the spouse (as the case may be) of the deceased Government servant, is not already employed under the Central Government or any State Government or a Corporation owned or controlled by the Central Government or any State Government, then a member of his/her family who is not already employed under the Central Government or any State Government or a Corporation owned or controlled by the 2025:UHC:7764

Central Government or State Government, shall on making an application for the purposes, be given a suitable employment in Government service in Group "D" or Group "C" as Junior Assistant or equivalent post, in relaxation of the normal recruitment rules if such person:-

(i) fulfils the educational qualifications prescribed for the post,

(ii) is otherwise qualified for Government service, and

(iii) makes the application for employment within five years of the date of the death of the Government servant:

Provided that where the State Government is satisfied that the time limit fixed for making the application for employment causes undue hardship in any particular case, it may dispense with or relax the requirement as it may consider necessary for dealing with the case in a just and equitable manner.

(2) As far as possible, such an employment should be given in the same department in which the deceased Government servant was employed before his death."

(3) Perusal of the aforesaid provision reveals that dependant of a deceased government servant is disqualified from seeking compassionate appointment under the State if the spouse of the deceased government servant is already employed under the Central Government or State Government or a Corporation owned or controlled by the Central Government or State Government. This is not the case here as it is not the case of the respondents that petitioner's mother is employed under the State or Central Government or any Government owned 2025:UHC:7764

Corporation.

(4) Thus, this Court finds substance in the submission made by learned Counsel for the petitioner that the ground taken for rejecting petitioner's claim for compassionate appointment is unsustainable.

(5) Learned Counsel also relied upon a judgment rendered by coordinate Bench in Writ Petition (S/S) No. 683 of 2012, where also similar view was taken. (6) In such view of the matter, writ petition is allowed. Impugned order dated 24.8.2020 is set aside. Competent authority is directed to reconsider petitioner's claim for compassionate appointment, strictly as per law, and pass appropriate order within one month from the date of production of certified copy of this order.

(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.)

2.9.2025 Pr PRABODH

DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF

2.5.4.20=3a082a00a95aff911a9559743af8f21c50602ff6eae4e61af3aeab198

KUMAR d462503, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=0DC111E8D8CA66E16B940EFDF806ACCC1AB588052DF6FC A58C67F3C91957BE53, cn=PRABODH KUMAR Date: 2025.09.04 10:06:13 +05'30' 2025:UHC:7764

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter