Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 5092 UK
Judgement Date : 29 October, 2025
2025:UHC:9526-DB
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. G. NARENDAR
AND
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHASH UPADHYAY
29TH OCTOBER, 2025
WRIT PETITION (S/B) NO. 380 OF 2025
Aman Gupta ......Petitioner.
Versus
State of Uttarakhand & another .......Respondents.
Counsel for the Petitioner : Mr. Sandeep Tiwari, learned
counsel.
Counsel for the State : Mr. C.S. Rawat, learned Chief
Standing Counsel with Mr. Navin
Tiwari, learned Brief Holder.
Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : Mr. Pankaj Miglani, learned counsel.
JUDGMENT :
(per Mr. G. Narendar, C.J.)
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and
learned Chief Standing Counsel for the State and
learned counsel for respondent no.2.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would
submit that the necessary pleadings in support of his
case are not completely set out in the petition, and in
that view he prays leave to withdraw the instant writ
petition with liberty to file a fresh petition on the same
cause of action with appropriate pleadings.
3. The submission is placed on record.
2025:UHC:9526-DB
4. Petition is dismissed with liberty to file a fresh
petition on the same cause of action subject to the
condition that the petition shall be filed within 15 days
from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, failing
which, the liberty granted shall stand revoked.
5. There shall be no order as to costs.
6. As a sequel thereto, pending application, if
any, shall stand closed.
________________ G. NARENDAR, C.J.
__________________ SUBHASH UPADHYAY, J.
Dated: 29th October, 2025 NISHANT
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!