Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Hon'Ble Ashish Naithani vs Smt. Suman
2025 Latest Caselaw 5070 UK

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 5070 UK
Judgement Date : 29 October, 2025

Uttarakhand High Court

Hon'Ble Ashish Naithani vs Smt. Suman on 29 October, 2025

                Office Notes,
             reports, orders or
SL.            proceedings or
      Date                                                   COURT'S OR JUDGES'S ORDERS
No             directions and
             Registrar's order
              with Signatures


                                  CRLR No. 697 of 2025
                                  Hon'ble Ashish Naithani, J.

Mr. Vaibhav Singh Chauhan, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Sagar Kothari, learned counsel for the Revisionist.

2. The present criminal revision under Section 438/442 of BNSS is moved on behalf of the Revisionist to set-aside the impugned judgment and order dated 26.09.2025 passed by learned 4th Additional Session Judge, Dehradun in Criminal Appeal No.127 of 2025, titled as "Tapeshwar Singh & Others vs. Smt. Suman Dhanai Chauhan & Anr." and in consequence setting-aside the order dated 04.04.2025 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate/1st Additional Civil Judge (Jr. Div), Dehradun in Criminal Misc. Case No.1302 of 2024, titled as "Smt. Suman Dhanai vs. Tapeshwar Singh & Anr." under Section 23 of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.

3. Learned counsel for the Revisionist makes a submission that while passing the impugned judgment and order dated 26.09.2025, the learned court has ignored the material evidence available on record; the learned court below ignored the fact that the Respondent no.1 is earning Rs.20,000/- per month, hence, she is not entitled to get any relief.

4. Learned counsel for the Revisionist makes a further submission that the learned court below have failed to take into consideration the serious condition of the parents of the Revisionist and also the fact that the Revisionist has to spend good amount of money in their medical treatment as well.

He further makes a submission that the impugned orders passed in favour of the Respondent is against the law, therefore, the same are liable to be set-aside.

5. Considering the submissions advanced by the learned counsel on behalf of the Revisionist/husband, interference is being called for in the matter.

6. Admit.

7. Issue notice to the Respondents, returnable within two weeks. Steps to be taken within one week.

8. Objections, if any, to be filed by the Respondents within a period of three weeks.

9. List this matter on 23.12.2025.

10. Till the next date of listing, the effect and operation of the judgment and order dated 04.04.2025 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate/1st Additional Civil Judge (Jr. Div), Dehradun in Criminal Misc. Case No.1302 of 2024, titled as "Smt. Suman Dhanai vs. Tapeshwar Singh & Anr." under Section 23 of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, shall remain stayed, subject to the condition that the Revisionist shall pay half of the interim maintenance as awarded by the learned Judicial Magistrate/1st Additional Civil Judge (Jr. Div), Dehradun, per month to the Respondents.

11. Stay Application (IA No.01 of 2025) stands disposed of.

(Ashish Naithani, J.) 29.10.2025 Akash

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter