Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 448 UK
Judgement Date : 15 May, 2025
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
IA No. 1 of 2023 (Bail Application)
In
Criminal Appeal No. 582 of 2023
Vikas Kumar Saini ........Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand ........Respondent
Present:-
Mr. Tajhar Qayyum, Advocate for the appellant.
Ms. Manisha Rana Singh, Deputy Advocate General for the State.
Hon'ble Ravindra Maithani, J.
Instant criminal appeal is preferred against the judgment
and order dated 06.07.2023 passed in Special Sessions Trial No. 48 of
2017, State v. Vikas Kumar Saini, by the court of First Additional
Sessions Judge, Roorkee, District Haridwar. By it, the appellant has
been convicted and sentenced under Section 25/4 of the Arms Act,
1959. He seeks bail during pendency of the appeal.
2. The appeal is already admitted.
3. Heard learned counsel for the parties on bail application
and perused the record.
4. Learned counsel for the appellant would submit that the
appellant has been sentenced to two years of imprisonment; he has
already undergone the period of sentence; there are less chances of the
appeal being heard in near future.
5. These factual narrations are not disputed by the learned
State Counsel.
6. Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is a
case in which the execution of sentence should be suspended and the
appellant be enlarged on bail.
7. The bail application is allowed.
8. The execution of sentence appealed against is suspended
during the pendency of the appeal.
9. Let the appellant be released on bail, during the
pendency of the appeal on his executing a personal bond and
furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, to the
satisfaction of the court concerned.
10. List the criminal appeal for final hearing in due course.
(Ravindra Maithani, J) 15.05.2025 Avneet/
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!