Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 151 UK
Judgement Date : 6 May, 2025
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Writ Petition No. 1267 of 2025 (M/S)
Naseema ..........Petitioner
Vs.
State of Uttarakhand and other ........... Respondents
Present : Mr. Susheel Kumar, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Gaurav Singh, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Mr. Suyash Pant, Standing Counsel for the State/respondent nos.1 to 4.
JUDGMENT
Hon'ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
The petitioner was running a Fair Price Shop. Her
license for sale was suspended and an inquiry was conducted and
Inquiry Report has been submitted to the respondent No.2/the
District Magistrate Haridwar. But, he has yet not taken any
decision. Therefore, the petitioner seeks directions that the
respondent no.2/the District Magistrate, Haridwar may be directed
to take a decision in the matter.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the
record.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that
the Inquiry Report has already been submitted to the respondent
no.2/the District Magistrate, Haridwar, but he has yet not taken
any decision. Therefore, he may be directed to take an early
decision in the matter.
4. Learned State counsel would submit that the decision
in the matter may be taken within a period of six weeks.
5. The Court takes on record the statement given by
learned State Counsel.
6. The petition is disposed of with the direction to the
respondent no.2/the District Magistrate, Haridwar to take a
decision in the matter within a period of six weeks.
(Ravindra Maithani, J.) 06.05.2025 Sanjay
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!