Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ram Baran Yadav vs State Of Uttarakhand And Others
2025 Latest Caselaw 3258 UK

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 3258 UK
Judgement Date : 25 June, 2025

Uttarakhand High Court

Ram Baran Yadav vs State Of Uttarakhand And Others on 25 June, 2025

Author: Manoj Kumar Tiwari
Bench: Manoj Kumar Tiwari
                                                               2025:UHC:5358-DB
     HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
        HON'BLE JUSTICE SRI MANOJ KUMAR TIWARI AND
          HON'BLE JUSTICE SRI SUBHASH UPADHYAY

                Writ Petition (S/B) No. 377 of 2015
Ram Baran Yadav                                            --Petitioner
                                     Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others                        --Respondents
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Advocates:-
Ms. Jasmeet Kaur, Advocate holding brief of Mr. S.S. Yadav, Advocate for petitioner
Mr. Devendra Singh Bora, Standing Counsel for State of Uttarakhand
--------------------------------------------------------------------
The Court made the following:
JUDGMENT:

(per Hon'ble Justice Sri Manoj Kumar Tiwari)

1. Petitioner was appointed as Lecturer (Physics) in a Government Inter College on the recommendation of Uttarakhand Public Service Commission w.e.f. 14.08.1986. He was promoted as Headmaster, Government High School in 2011; however, he joined duties as Headmaster on 02.01.2012. In the exercise for promotion to the next higher post of Principal, Government Inter College, petitioner's name was not considered for promotion. Thus feeling aggrieved, petitioner filed this writ petition in 2015, seeking following reliefs:-

"I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the DPC proceeding dated 28.08.2015 issued by respondent no.1 (contained as Annexure No.7 to this writ petition) and further be pleased to quash the promotion order dated 12.12.2011 which is depicted in the second promotion list dated 12.12.2011 be modified on the place of 12.12.2011 as 23.07.2011 and provide all the benefit since 23.07.2011 to the petitioner in all respect.

II. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the Respondent no.1 to 3 declare the result of the DPC proceeding including the name of the petitioner for the promotion on the post Principal Govt. Inter College of the State of Uttarakhand.

III. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the Respondents to maintain the status quo till the final disposal of the petition."

2025:UHC:5358-DB

2. Learned State Counsel has produced in Court written instructions received from Secretary, Secondary Education, which are taken on record.

3. Perusal of the written instructions reveals that as per applicable recruitment rules, a candidate who had served on the feeder post of Headmaster, Government High School for minimum five years alone was eligible to be considered for promotion as Principal, Government Inter College. He submits that State Government ultimately granted relaxation in qualifying service to the extent of 50 percent in terms of Rules known as "Uttarakhand Government Servants Relaxation in Qualifying Service for Promotion Rules, 2010".

4. He further submits that however the State Government had decided that only such persons who assumed charge as Headmaster in a Government High School on or before 31.12.2011 will be considered for promotion. He submits that since petitioner assumed charge as Headmaster on 02.01.2012, therefore he was not found eligible and his case was not considered for promotion.

5. We find substance in the contention raised by learned State Counsel. Since petitioner was not qualified as per Rules for promotion as Principal and even after grant of relaxation in qualifying service, he was not coming within the cut-off date fixed by State Government. Even otherwise also, at the time of filing of writ petition, petitioner was 58 years of age, thus he would have attained age of superannuation in 2017.

2025:UHC:5358-DB

6. Thus we do not find any reason to interfere in the matter, that too at this belated stage. Writ petition fails and is dismissed.

_______________________________ MANOJ KUMAR TIWARI, J.

____________________________ SUBHASH UPADHYAY, J.

Dt: 25th June, 2025 Mahinder

MAHINDER

DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH

2.5.4.20=da6212e6e78d94ed3134842bc6a8d6ca168979ca7 b8c2f031a92d1a18b08923c, postalCode=263001,

SINGH st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=AB77B7C5B240908B392BE84F5CDD4C2AF35 DC4626D305B1BC9EA4BABA43D2B8F, cn=MAHINDER SINGH Date: 2025.06.26 19:18:09 +05'30'

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter