Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1114 UK
Judgement Date : 5 June, 2025
2025:UHC:4565-DB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AT NAINITAL
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI G. NARENDAR
AND
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK MAHRA
05th June, 2025
WRIT PETITION CRIMINAL No. 390 OF 2025
Rashmi Bahl ...Petitioner
Versus
State of Uttarakhand
and Others ...Respondents
Presence:-
Mr. Nishant Krishna Adhikari, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Mr. J.S. Virk, learned Deputy Advocate General for the State.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
JUDGMENT:
(per Hon'ble The Chief Justice Sri G. Narendar)
Learned counsel for the petitioner had argued the
matter for some time in the morning and after having
pointed out that the remedy would lie elsewhere, in
view of the proceedings pending before the competent
court of law, learned counsel had sought time to secure
instructions.
2. Matter is called in the post-lunch session. Learned
counsel submits that he has been instructed to seek
withdrawal of the petition.
3. Submission of learned counsel is placed on record.
2025:UHC:4565-DB
4. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
5. It is open for the petitioner to agitate his
grievances before the appropriate forum.
_______________ G. NARENDAR, C.J.
_______________ ALOK MAHRA, J.
Dt: 5th June, 2025 UJJWAL
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!