6 December vs Tarun Himalaya And Ors
2025 Latest Caselaw 6359 UK

Uttarakhand High Court

6 December vs Tarun Himalaya And Ors on 16 December, 2025

Author: Pankaj Purohit

Bench: Pankaj Purohit

                                                      2025:UHC:11206



HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
       Writ Petition Misc. Single No.3457 of 2025
                       16 December, 2025

Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited (BHEL)                 --Petitioner

                              Versus
Tarun Himalaya and Ors.                              --Respondents
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Presence:-

      Mr. Birendra Singh Adhikari, learned counsel for
      petitioner.
      Mr. K.S. Mehta, learned Additional C.S.C. for the
      State of Uttarakhand/respondent No.3.

Hon'ble Pankaj Purohit, J. (Oral)

By means of the present writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, petitioner has sought the indulgence of this Court for a direction to learned Commissioner, Garhwal Division, Pauri Camp at Dehradun, to expedite the hearing of Appeal No.01 of 2016-17 BHEL Vs. Tarun Himalaya and Others, pending before the learned Commissioner, Garhwal Mandal, Pauri Camp at Dehradun.

2. It is the contention of the learned counsel for petitioner that the said Appeal was file before learned Commissioner on 02.11.2016 against the judgment and order dated 21.09.2016 passed by learned Assistant Collector-First Class/SDM, Haridwar, in Case No.02 of 2011 Tarun Himalaya Vs. State.

3. It is further contended by learned counsel for petitioner that since then the hearing of the appeal could not have been concluded for various reasons. He has drawn the attention of this Court to the entire order

2025:UHC:11206 sheet annexed by him as Annexure No.2 to the writ petition to submit that most of the time the Appeal could not have been heard due to the absence of Presiding Officer.

4. I have seen the record and found the contention of the learned counsel for petitioner correct. However, it is also reflected from the order-sheet that most of the adjournments was also sought by the appellant (petitioner herein) itself.

5. Be that as it may, Appeal is of the year 2016 and to decide the Appeal only hearing is required, therefore, in the given set of facts and circumstances, learned counsel for petitioner is successful in making out a case for direction to learned Commissioner, for expedite hearing of Appeal.

6. Accordingly, the present writ petition is allowed. Learned Commissioner, Garhwal Division, Pauri Camp at Dehradun, is directed to hear and decide the Appeal No.01 of 2016-17 BHEL Vs. Tarun Himalaya and Others, expeditiously but not later than three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order.

(Pankaj Purohit, J.) 16.12.2025 PN