Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 6105 UK
Judgement Date : 4 December, 2025
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Writ Petition No. 3353 of 2025 (M/S)
Madarsa Asharful Ulum ..........Petitioner
Vs.
State of Uttarakhand and others ........ Respondents
Present : Mr. Ahrar Baig, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Suyash Pant, Standing Counsel for the State/respondent nos.1,
2, 3, 4 and 6.
JUDGMENT
Hon'ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral) By means of the instant petition, the petitioner seeks
the following reliefs:-
"i. Issue an appropriate writ, order, or directions to the Respondents no.6 to immediately de-seal the Petitioner's Madarsa/Maktab and restore its operations.
ii. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of prohibition, prohibiting the respondents from stopping Deeni Tamil of petitioner.
iii. Issue an appropriate writ, order or directions declare the sealing of the Madarsa/Maktab as illegal, arbitrary, and unconstitutional.
iv. Issue any other order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.
v. Award the cost of the petition to the petitioner."
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the
record.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the very outset
submits that the controversy has already been decided by this
Court in Writ Petition (M/S) No.835 of 2025, Madarsa Inamul Ulum
Society Vs. State of Uttarakhand and others, and connected cases
on 26.08.2025.
4. Learned State Counsel admits this fact.
5. Since, the matter is covered, instant petition is decided
in terms of the judgment dated 26.08.2025, passed in Writ Petition
(M/S) No.835 of 2025, Madarsa Inamul Ulum Society Vs. State of
Uttarakhand and others, and connected cases.
(Ravindra Maithani, J.) 04.12.2025 Sanjay
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!