Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 3412 UK
Judgement Date : 25 August, 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
IA No.1 of 2025 For Bail Application
In
Criminal Appeal No. 270 of 2016
Atar Singh ...... Appellant
Vs.
State of Uttarakhand ..... Respondent
Present:
Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, Advocate for the appellant.
Mr. Pankaj Joshi, A.G.A. for the State of Uttarakhand.
Coram: Hon'ble Ravindra Maithani, J.
Hon'ble Alok Mahra, J.
Hon'ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
The instant appeal has been preferred against
judgment and order dated 25.07.2016, passed in Special Sessions
Trial No.205 of 2015, State Vs. Atar Singh, by the court of
FTC/Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge, POCSO,
Rudrapur, District Udham Singh Nagar. By it, the appellant has
been convicted and sentenced under Sections 376(2) and 452 IPC.
2. Heard.
3. This is an admitted appeal.
4. List in due course for final hearing.
5. Heard on Bail Application (IA) No.1 of 2025.
6. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the
appellant has already undergone more than half of the period of
sentence imposed on him; there are less chances of appeal being
heard in near future.
7. This fact is not disputed by learned State Counsel.
8. Having considered, this Court is of the view that it
is a case in which the execution of sentence should be suspended
and the appellant be enlarged on bail.
9. The bail application is allowed.
10. The sentence appealed against is suspended
during the pendency of the appeal.
11. The appellant be released on bail during the
pendency of the appeal on his executing a personal bond and
furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, to the
satisfaction of the court concerned.
(Alok Mahra, J.) (Ravindra Maithani, J.) 25.08.2025 25.08.2025
Ravi Bisht
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!