Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 2566 UK
Judgement Date : 19 August, 2025
Office Notes,
reports, orders or
SL. proceedings or
Date COURT'S OR JUDGES'S ORDERS
No directions and
Registrar's order
with Signatures
WPMS No.2254 of 2024
Hon'ble Pankaj Purohit, J.
Mr. Ravi Sehgal, Advocate for the petitioner, through video conferencing.
2. Mr. Amar Murti Shukla, Advocate for respondent no.1.
3. Mr. Ajay Singh Bisht, Advocate for respondent nos.3 and 4.
4. Misc. Application (IA No.2 of 2025) is allowed. Counter affidavit filed on behalf of respondent nos.3 and 4 is taken on record.
5. It is contended by counsel for respondent no.1 that it is a very strange case where the judgment and order passed by quasi judicial authority has been challenged by another quasi judicial authority, which cannot be permitted as the affected person is Central Government, who choose not to challenge the said order, which is not before this Court.
6. He relied upon certain judgments passed by various High Courts' including Co-ordinate Bench of this Court.
7. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would reply to the submissions made by counsel for the respondents while appearing before this Court, physically.
8. List this case on 20.08.2025.
9. Interim order dated 02.09.2024 is extended, till the next date of listing.
(Pankaj Purohit, J.) 19.08.2025 SK
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!