Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1460 UK
Judgement Date : 1 August, 2025
2025:UHC:6767-DB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. G. NARENDAR
AND
THE HON'BLE JUSTICE MR. ALOK MAHRA
Public Interest Litigation No. 141 of 2025
1st August, 2025
Suneet Singh ..............Petitioner
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and Others ..........Respondents
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Presence:-
Mr. Arjun Arora holding brief of Mr. AbhishekVerma, learned
counsel for the petitioner.
Mr. J.C. Pandey, learned Standing Counsel for the State of
Uttarakhand.
Mr. Sanjay Bhatt, learned counsel for State Election
Commission/respondent no.2.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
JUDGMENT :
(per Mr. G. Narendar C. J.)
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner
and the learned Standing Counsel for the State
Election Commission.
2. The instant writ petition is preferred
praying for the following reliefs:
"1. Direct an impartial and independent committee to conduct a fair inquiry, before 24.07.2025, into the role of Respondent Nos. 5 in making fraudulent entries using fabricated documents, and into the involvement and eligibility of the 200 individuals to vote in the upcoming Panchayat
2025:UHC:6767-DB Buxaura whose names were allegedly included illegally in the voter list.
2. Order to allow voting of these 200 individuals in the upcoming elections of gram panchayat Buxaura if it is found by the independent committee that they are eligible to vote as per Uttarakhand Panchayat Raj Act and Constitution of India.
3. Issue a writ of mandamus directing the Respondents to delete the 200 fraudulently included names from the voter list of Gram Sabha Buxaura after due enquiry and providing them opportunity of hearing in accordance with the provisions of the Uttarakhand Panchayati Raj Act, 2016."
3. Learned Standing Counsel for the State
Election Commission submits that, pursuant to the
filing of the writ petition, action has been initiated
and the Village Development Officer has been
placed under suspension and such of those names,
who were found not ordinarily residing in the
Village, have also been deleted.
4. Per contra, learned counsel for the
petitioner would submit that some of the persons,
whose names have been pointed out by the
2025:UHC:6767-DB petitioner, have already cast their votes in the
elections that were held on 24.07.2025.
5. If the petitioner is of the opinion that the
elections are vitiated, it is always open for the
petitioner to avail the remedy of an Election
Petition and the Election Tribunal, being competent
to address the issue, will consider the same, in
accordance with law.
6. In view of the submissions made by the
learned Standing Counsel for the State Election
Commission that action has already been initiated,
we are of the opinion that the instant writ petition
can be disposed of by granting liberty to the
petitioner to seek remedy before the Election
Tribunal.
7. The writ petition stands disposed of
accordingly.
(G. NARENDAR, C. J.)
(ALOK MAHRA, J.) Dated: 01.08.2025 Mamta
2025:UHC:6767-DB
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!