Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 3531 UK
Judgement Date : 3 April, 2025
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Writ Petition No. 864 of 2025 (M/S)
Manju Alias Mahendri ..........Petitioner
Vs.
Collector District Haridwar and Another ..... Respondents
Present : Ms. Devanshi Joshi, Advocate for the petitioner.
JUDGMENT
Hon'ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
The petitioner seeks directions for expeditious
disposal of the Mutation Case No.29/2014-15, State Vs.
Manju @ Mahendri, pending in the court of
Collector/Additional District Magistrate (Administration),
Haridwar.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and
perused the record.
3. Cases may not be expedited on mere filing of a
petition. Cases are prioritized and listed according to the
pendency of cases in a particular court. Simply because
some litigant approaches this Court, a case may not be
prioritized. This is one aspect of the matter. Another
aspect of the matter is that every case needs expeditious
disposal. But then, as stated, cases are prioritized based
on the age of the cases, position of the parties, etc.
4. This Court has no doubt that the court
concerned shall make endeavour to decide cases pending
in the court as expeditiously as possible, as per priority
and pendency of the cases in that court.
5. With the above observation, the writ petition
stands disposed of, accordingly.
(Ravindra Maithani, J.) 03.04.2025 Ravi Bisht
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!