Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 949 UK
Judgement Date : 14 May, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AT NAINITAL
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MS. RITU BAHRI
AND
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAKESH THAPLIYAL
14TH MAY, 2024
WRIT PETITION (PIL) No. 46 OF 2022
Ajit Singh.
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others.
...Respondents
Counsel for the petitioner. : Mr. Jitendra Chaudhary, learned
counsel.
Counsel for respondent nos. 1 & : Mr. Gajendra Tripathi, learned
4. Standing Counsel for the State of
Uttarakhand.
Counsel for respondent nos. 2 & : Mr. Aditya Pratap Singh, learned
3. counsel.
Counsel for respondent no. 5. : Mr. Rajeev Bhatt, learned counsel.
Counsel for respondent no. 6 : Mr V.K. Kohli, learned Senior Counsel
assisted by Mr. Balvinder Singh,
learned counsel.
JUDGMENT :
(per Ms. Ritu Bahri, C.J.)
Counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw
the present Writ Petition (PIL), as it was filed initially
keeping in view the Rules of 2020. However, in the
counter affidavit, it was clarified that the application for
grant of license was given in the year 2018, when the
Rules of 2016 were applicable. Since the Rules of 2020
are not applicable, counsel for the petitioner wants to
withdraw the present Writ Petition (PIL).
2. In view of the statement made by learned
counsel for the petitioner, the present Writ Petition
(PIL) is dismissed as withdrawn.
3. Pending application(s), if any, also stand
disposed of accordingly.
______________ RITU BAHRI, C.J.
__________________ RAKESH THAPLIYAL, J.
Dt: 14th May, 2024 Rahul
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!