Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 944 UK
Judgement Date : 14 May, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AT NAINITAL
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MS. RITU BAHRI
AND
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH THAPLIYAL
WRIT PETITION (M/B) NO. 25 OF 2024
14TH MAY, 2024
Naveen Aggarwal ...... Petitioner
Versus
State of Uttarakhand & others ...... Respondents
Counsel for the petitioner : Mr. Mehul Joshi, learned counsel
holding brief of Mr. Bhuwan Bhatt,
learned counsel
Counsel for the respondents : Mr. K.N. Joshi, learned Deputy
Advocate General for the State
: Mr. B.S. Negi, learned counsel for
respondent Nos. 2 & 3
The Court made the following:
JUDGMENT:
(per Hon'ble The Chief Justice Ms. Ritu Bahri)
Counsel for the petitioner makes a statement at
Bar that the tender has been cancelled by the respondents,
hence, the present petition has rendered infructuous.
2) In view of the above statement, the writ petition
is dismissed as infructuous.
3) Pending application, if any, also stands disposed
of.
_______________ RITU BAHRI, C.J.
________________ RAKESH THAPLIYAL, J.
TH
Dt: 14 MAY, 2024
Negi
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!