Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 493 UK
Judgement Date : 21 March, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AT NAINITAL
MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI, C.J.
AND
MR. RAKESH THAPLIYAL, J.
21ST MARCH, 2024
WRIT PETITION (PIL) NO. 49 OF 2024
Divyansh Sharma .....Petitioner.
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others. .........Respondents
Counsel for the petitioner : Mr. Puneet Kansal, learned counsel.
Counsel for the respondents : Mr. P.C. Bisht, learned Additional
Chief Standing Counsel for the State.
Upon hearing the learned Counsel, the Court
made the following
JUDGMENT :
(per: Ms. Ritu Bahri, C.J.)
The petitioner in the present writ petition is
seeking a direction from this Court to constitute an
investigating team, to freeze the powers of respondent
No. 5 and to take action against a few persons.
2. Though the petitioner has prayed that action
against some persons be directed to be taken, but none
of them has been arrayed as a respondent in this
petition. In the petition, though an allegation has been
made that illegal activities were done, but what are
those illegal activities, has not been mentioned clearly.
3. In the aforesaid backdrop, the present public
interest litigation is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to approach the police of the police station
concerned with regard to registration of complaint
against respondent No. 5.
_____________ RITU BAHRI, C.J.
__________________ RAKESH THAPLIYAL, J.
Dt: 21st March, 2024 Rathour
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!